SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

K.Navlakha

A/14/1209

Page 1 of 14

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

GUJARAT STATE AHMEDABAD.

COURT NO: 03

APPEAL NO. 1209 of 2014

Life Insurance Corporation of India

Through its Ahmedabad Division Office,

At “Jivan Prakash”,

Tilak Road, P.B. No. 277,

Ahmedabad- 380 001. ...Appellant.

V.s

1. Hetalben Ashwinbhai Patel,

2. Minor Harsh Ashwinbhai Patel,

(No. 2 being minor represented through no.1-mother)

Both Residing at 160, Om Shree Sai Jalaram Society,

Patel Nagar, Opposite Police Chowky,

Udhna, Surat. ...Respondents.

=============================================================

BEFORE: Mr. I. D. Patel, Judicial Member

APPERANCE: Mr. M. J. Shelat L.A. for the appellant,

Mr. Heta Shah L.A. for the respondent.

==============================================================

ORDER BY Mr. I. D. PATEL, JUDICIAL MEMBER.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant original respondent No. 1 has preferred the present appeal

as per the provisions of Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986

against the impugned judgment and order of additional Case No.

639/11 passed by Ld. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surat

(Additional), dated 30.12.2013 on the ground stated in appeal memo.

The appellant is the original opponents whereas the respondents are the

original complainant.

2. The brief facts of the complainant before the Ld. District Forum, Surat

(Additional), are that the husband of the complainant No. 1 Hetalben

Ashwinbhai Patel namely Ashwinbhai Patel had taken Life Insurance

Details

DD MM YY

Date of disposal 15

12

2022

Date of filing

13

05

2014

Duration

02

06

08

K.Navlakha

A/14/1209

Page 2 of 14

Policy of sum assured of Rs. 7,50,000/- from the opponent Insurance

Corporation of India dated 19.06.2010 and the said Policy commences

from 15.04.2010. It is further, the case of the complainant that on

28.12.2010 on account of Abdominal pain and Respiratory problem the

deceased Ashwinbhai admitted in Vrunda Hospital Pvt. Ltd. where

during the course of his medical examination he was a diagnosed of

Hepatocelluco

Carconina

and

thereafter,

deceased

Ashwinbhai

discharge from the Hospital on 03.01.2011 and thereafter on

05.01.2011 Ashwinbhai died on account of the said illness. Therefore,

the complainant No. 1 being a nomine of the Policy in question lodged

the claim with the Life Insurance Corporation of India for getting the

sum assured of the said Policy of his Husband but the Insurance

Company has repudiated the claim of the deceased Ashwinbhai vide

letter dated 31.03,2011 on the ground that deceased ashwinbhai

suppress the material information regarding kidney Transplant in his

proposal form therefore, the complainants filed the complaint as per

provision of the Consumer Protection Act being the additional Case No.

639/11 before the Ld. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surat

(Additional), against the Life Insurance Corporation of India.

3. That the Ld. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, issued notice to the

opponent Life Insurance Corporation of India in the said case whereby

in pursuance of the said notice Life Insurance Corporation of India has

appeared and filed the detail reply whereby Life Insurance Corporation

of India denied all the facts stated in the complaint and more

particularly denied the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on

the part of the LIC. Furthermore, Life Insurance Co. of India has also

contended in their reply that the Insurance Company had repudiated

the claim of DLA Ashwinbhai on the ground of suppression of material

fact in the proposal form and more particularly suppression of the

Kidney Transplant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top