SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

Appeal No.1670/2012

Date of filing: 11.08.2022

Date of disposal: 19.08.2022

BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

DATED:19.08.2022

PRESENT

Mr.K.B SANGANNANAVAR

:

JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mrs. DIVYASHREE M

:

LADY MEMBER

APPEAL NO.1670/2022

TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd.,

No.69, 3rd Floor,

Jamboo Keshava Archade,

Millers Road, Bangalore-52.

Represented by its

Authorized Signatory.

(Advocate – Sri.Prashant T Pandit)

…..Appellant/s

V/s

Sri.H.G Venkataramu,

S/o Dathugowda,

R/at Hadavanahalli Village,

Santhebachahalli Hobli,

Krishnaraja Pete Taluk,

Mandya.

…..Respondent/s

Appeal No.1670/2012

ORDER

Mr.K.B SANGANNANAVAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

This is an Appeal filed U/s.41 of C.P Act, 2019 by OP in

complaint No.17/2018 on the file of District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Mandya, aggrieved by the order dated 12th

April 2022.

2. The Commission examined the grounds of Appeal,

impugned order and heard learned counsel.

3. Learned counsel for Appellant placed a reliance reported in

2022(1) CPR 1 (Karnt.) in a case of Tata AIG General Insurance Co.

Ltd., versus Mr.C.Venkataramana and Ors., wherein held “Forum

has not made efforts to get the Report with regard to the alleged

loss of the Insured Crops assessed by the OPs. On examination of

the

records,

as

State

Commission

found

participation

of

Department of Agriculture and Government is necessary party but

facts remained in the case on hand Commission below found loss

of crop was due to heavy rain and high speed wind as a result fall

of the live electric line on the Banana crop.

4. In the above such circumstances, on reevaluating the

materials on record, in our view awarding of Rs.27,196/- has to be

held contrary to the documents, has to be reduced to Rs.14,000/-

Appeal No.1670/2012

and the rate of interest awarded at 9% shall have to be reduced to

6% considering the nature of dispute. In such conclusion to avoid

further delay we dispense with issuance of notice of this Appeal to

the Respondent/complainant. Accordingly proceed to allow the

Appeal in part. Consequently modifies the impugned order and

directed OP/Appellant to pay Rs.14,000/- along with interest @ 6%

p.a from the date of complaint till realization and do pay Rs.4,000/-

towards mental agony and physical inconvenience and Rs.2,500/-

towards litigation cost within 30 days.

5. Amount in deposit is directed to be transfer to the District

Commission for needful with a direction to refund the amount in

favour of OP if amount is already paid to the complainant.

6. Provide copy of this order to the District Commission as

well as parties to the appeal.

LADY MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

vln*

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top