[A/16/2959 & A/16/2960 and A/17/188 & A/17/189]

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

FIRST APPEAL NO.A/16/2959 A/16/2960 AND

FIRST APPEAL NO.A/17/188 and A/17/189

A/16/2959

M/s DEV DEVELOPER’S Partners

1. Anant alias Anil Narayan Malvankar

1869 B. Pitrunivas, Malshed Lane,

SomwarPethMalvan,

Tal.Malvan, Dist.Sindhudurga.

2. AnujaAnantMalvankar

1869 B. Pitrunivas, Malshed Lane,

SomwarPethMalvan,

Tal.Malvan, Dist.Sindhudurga.

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

PRASAD PANDHARINATH WALAWALKAR

Madure, Tal.Sawantwadi,

Dist.Sindhudurga.

............Respondent(s)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A/16/2960

M/s DEV DEVELOPER’S Partners

1. Anant alias Anil Narayan Malvankar

1869 B. Pitrunivas, Malshed Lane,

SomwarPethMalvan,

Tal.Malvan, Dist.Sindhudurga.

2. AnujaAnantMalvankar

1869 B. Pitrunivas, Malshed Lane,

SomwarPethMalvan,

Tal.Malvan, Dist.Sindhudurga.

...........Appellant(s)

[A/16/2959 & A/16/2960 and A/17/188 & A/17/189]

Versus

PRACHI PRASAD WALAWALKAR

Madure, Tal.Sawantwadi,

Dist.Sindhudurga.

Through Constituted Attorney

Prasad PandharinathWalawalkar

............Respondent(s)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A/17/188

MRS.PRACHI PRASAD WALAWALKAR

...........Appellant(s)

Madure, Tal.Sawantwadi,

Dist.Sindhudurga.

Through Constituted Attorney

Prasad PandharinathWalawalkar

Versus

M/s DEV DEVELOPER’S Partners

1. Anant alias Anil Narayan Malvankar

1869 B. Pitrunivas, Majid Lane,

SomwarPethMalvan,

Tal.Malvan, Dist.Sindhudurga.

2. AnujaAnantMalvankar

1869 B. Pitrunivas, Majid Lane,

SomwarPethMalvan,

Tal.Malvan, Dist.Sindhudurga.

............Respondent(s)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A/17/189

PRASAD PANDHARINATH WALAWALKAR

Madure, Tal.Sawantwadi,

Dist.Sindhudurga............Appellant(s)

Versus

M/s DEV DEVELOPER’S Partners

1. Anant alias Anil Narayan Malvankar

1869 B. Pitrunivas, Majid Lane,

............Respondent(s)

[A/16/2959 & A/16/2960 and A/17/188 & A/17/189]

SomwarPethMalvan,

Tal.Malvan, Dist.Sindhudurga.

2. AnujaAnantMalvankar

1869 B. Pitrunivas, Majid Lane,

SomwarPethMalvan,

Tal.Malvan, Dist.Sindhudurga.

BEFORE:

JUSTICE A.P.BHANGALE, Hon’ble PRESIDENT

DR.S.K.KAKADE, Hon’ble MEMBER

PRESENT:

Complainants present in person

Advocate Shri.AbhayParab for Opponent

(M/s DEV DEVELOPER’S Partners)

COMMON ORDER

Per Dr.S.K.Kakade, Hon’ble Member

1. Being aggrieved by the judgement and order in the Consumer Complaint

no. 46 of 2014, by learned Sindhudurg District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Forum, Sindhudurg, dated 16^thSeptember 2016, partly allowing

the complaint and awarding compensation to complainants for less built

up area, the opposite party, Dev Developers filed two separate

appealsagainst both the complainants (FA no.A/16/ 2959 and FA no.

A/16/2960), while original complaints also filed cross appeals (FA no. A/

17/188 and FA no. A/17/ 189) against the same order of District

Consumer Forum. Since all four appeals were against the same order of

the District Consumer Forum, they were heard together. The brief facts of

the compliant are as follows,

2. Facts necessary for deciding this appeal are as under-

The complainants belong to Malwan, TalukaMalwan, and District

Sindhudurg, who booked flats in Nageshwar Park complex situated in

[A/16/2959 & A/16/2960 and A/17/188 & A/17/189]

Bangiwada, survey no.246, Hissa no. A B and 7 developed by Dev

developers, opposite party in the complaint. Complainants Prasad

PandharinathWalawalkar booked flat no. 206 and Mrs. PrachiPrasad

Walawalkar flat no. 205 in the West wing, second floor of the said

complex. The consideration agreed for flat no. 205 was Rs.10, 96, 368/-

(Rs. Ten Lakh Ninety Six Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Eight only) and

that a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document