SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

Cause Title/Judgement-Entry
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
First Appeal No. A/16/823
( Date of Filing : 19 Dec 2016 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/468/2014 of District Trissur)
 
1. ABI AND ANOTHER
..
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SUMESH
..
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH PRESIDING MEMBER
  SRI.RANJIT.R MEMBER
  SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 24 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

THE KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, VAZHUTHACADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPEAL  NO.  823/2016

ORDER DATED.24/11/2022

(Appeal  filed against the order in  CC.No. 468/2014,DCDRC, Thrissur)

PRESENT:                 

          SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH:JUDICIAL MEMBER 

          SRI. RANJIT. R  : MEMBER

          SMT. BEENAKUMARI. A : MEMBER

APPELLANTS:

  1. Abi Antony, Chairman Himavarsha Kuries Poovathingal House,

S/o Antony Chembakavu  Thrippakulam,   Thrissur.

  1. M.M. Lookose,  Director Himavarsha Kuries, Thrissur.

(By Adv. Sylvester Raphael  )

V/S

RESPONDENTS:

  1. Sumesh. K.S. S/o K.S. Sukumaran, Lalitha Nivas Canal Road

Kadanad,  P.O, Ernakulam.

  1. Himavarsha Kuries, Regd.office Thrissur Door No. T.C 9/242/2,

1st  Floor,  Near CSI, Bethal Asharaman, Mission Quarters, Thrissur, Rep. By Chairman.

  1. Mercy, Director,Himavarsha Kuries, W/o  Antony, Akkarapattil house, Panamkuttichira, Edakunnivillage, Thrissur.
  2.   George Immatty,Director, Himavarsha Kuries, Thrissur,

Plot No. 18, Nehru Nagar,  Kuriachira,  Thrissur.

  1. K.L. Davy, Director, Himavarsha Kuries,  Thrissur.
  2. V.A. Shaju, Director, Himavarsha Kuries, Thrissur.

ORDER

SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH:JUDICIAL MEMBER 

          No representation  for both sides.  It is seen that  there was no representation for either side for the last several posting.  On the last posting  was directed that no further  time would be granted for hearing.  No  representation for both sides today also.  It shows that the  appellant  is no more interested in prosecuting  the matter.  Hence the appeal  is dismissed. 

                                                          T.S.P.MOOSATH :JUDICIAL MEMBER       

RANJIT. R  : MEMBER

BEENA KUMARI. A : MEMBER

Sh/-

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RANJIT.R]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A]
MEMBER
 
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top