SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1 FA/295/2017

Date of filing :08.03.2017

Date of order :23.12.2021

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE

REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, BENCH AT

AURANGABAD.

FIRST APPEAL NO. : 295 OF 2017

IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 156OF 2016

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM : OSMANABAD.

Milind s/o Madhukar Janrao,

R/o Wadgaon, (Siddeshwar),

Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad.

APPELLANT

VERSUS

1. The Executive Engineer,

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd,

Osmanabad.

2. The Dy. Executive Engineer,

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd,

Sub Div. Osmanabad.

3. The Assistant Engineer,

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd,

Osmanabad.

4. The Asst. Electricity Inspector,

Electricity Inspection Section, Osmanabad.

Gapat Building, Gandhi Nagar,

Osmanabad.

RESPONDENT No.1to4.

CORAM :Smt.S.T.Barne, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member.

Mr.K.M.Lawande, Hon’ble Member.

Present :

Adv.P.M.Gaikwad for appellant,

Adv.S.N.Tandale for respondent.

2 FA/295/2017

J U D G M E N T

(Delivered on 23/12/2021)

Per Smt.S.T.Barne, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member.

1.

The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgement

and order in consumer complaint 156 /2016 decided by District

Consumer Forum Osmanabad, on 17 January 2017. The appellant is

the complainant and the respondents 1to4 are the opponents in the

complaint before District Consumer Forum.

2. It is the case of complainant that he is having agricultural land

Gut no. 407 area about 1hector 70 Aar, situated at Vadgaon( Si.

)Taluka and District Osmanabad. He has cultivated sugarcane crop in

the area of 1 hector land in the year 2013. On 9.3.15 due to

intermingling of electrical wire there occurred sparking in the D. P.

situated on the boundary of the land of complainant. Due to falling

of sprinkles of sparking, the residus of sugarcane crop caught with

fire. Due to which his sugarcane crop, pipeline, grazing grass, also

caught with fire & destroyed. It is the contention of complainant that

near about 9.95 tons of burnt sugarcane was supplied to the sugar

factory and remaining sugarcane crop which was caught with fire, has

sustained total loss to the remaining sugarcane crop, pipeline and

the grazing grass of the animals due to fire. Thus, he has assessed

total loss worth Rs. 3,15,000/-. The complainant has given intimation

of this incident to Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd,.

The Assistant Superintendent of Osmanabad Division gave visit to the

spot and he has submitted his report that, due to lack of oil in the

3 FA/295/2017

distributing plant i.e. Rohitra, the dried grass would have caught with

fire and out of it the sugarcane crop might have caught with fire. This

is occurred due to negligence of Maharashtra State Electricity

Distribution Co.Ltd, & the complainant has sustained loss to his

sugarcane crop. The complainant has submitted application to the

Talathi of their Sajja(area). He has drawn spot panchnama. The

complainant has issued notice to the opponent calling upon them to

pay compensation to him. However, they did not comply said notice.

Hence, he has filed the consumer complaint before District Consumer

Commission Osmanabad and claim compensation of Rs. 3,15,000/-,

the compensation of Rs.20,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.

5,000/-cost of the proceedings.

3. The opponents have filed their written version to said

complaint. It is at page no. 43, of appeal compilation. The opponents

have denied all adverse contentions in the complaint. The

complainant has made allegations of loss due to incident of sparking

in D.P. The said i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top