SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A/17/730

1/3

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

FIRST APPEALNO.A/17/730

M/s.Asmita Builders & Developers

Through its Proprietor

Shri Vitthal Mahadu Patil,

R/at : Bhagatwadi, Post Navin Panvel,

Tal.Panvel, Dist.Raigad.

...........Appellant (s)

Versus

Shri Kishor Madhukarrao Kende

R/at : Shravan Society, Plot No.18,

Sector No.12, New Panvel East,

Tal.Panvel, Dist.Raigad.

............Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Hon’ble Mr.Justice A.P.Bhangale, PRESIDENT

Hon’ble Dr.S.K.Kakade, MEMBER

For the Appellant:

Adv.Anil Jadhav a/w.Adv.Kondhalkar

For the Respondent: Respondent in person

ORAL ORDER

Per Mr.Justice A.P.Bhangale, President

Heard submissions advanced by both the parties at the Bar.

We had heard appellant on 05/12/2019 and at the request of the

respondent, Mr.Kishor Kende, we had finally adjourned the appeal.

Today, he prayed for an adjournment on the ground that he wants to

engage Mr.Vinod D. Gangwal and Ms.Himalee Divekar as his advocate.

However, none of them are present along with him. We cannot approve

this practice of mere filing vakalatnama at the hands of whom one who

wants to engage advocate.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top