SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

i.L

I

c--{=to.^-r - &r o t- e n/ro ,/ ^ \t \a f zw

Iti" --X for^".r :. -D,g n fo.^^ A1gl ct

o"tt-y O.-\ga.^1- s- q _ 1szn3

BEFORE THE HONOUR^ABLE GONSUMER

Drs purEs R EDREsSAL corunnrsCro rr,

MAHARASHTRA STATE ar r,rur.aeAi

(APPELLATE JURtsDtcTtoNl

Menrorandunr of Appear under secti., l5 of the

Consumer protection Act. l9g6

Appcar ," --L{f 9- or2ooo

In thcr nratter clf -

Appellant :-

Ravindra Ghanashyarn Kher

Resident of Shree I)arshan Appartnrent,

Near Siddhi Mnavak Mandir,

.latharpeth, Aliola.

-- Versus --

Respondent;- ExecutiveEngineer(tJrbanarea)

Maharashtra State Electricitv Board.

_-__-- oo

l'he nrenrorandunr ofappeal ofthe appealantabove named

rrrost respecttirlh, shorveth :

l.

'[his is alt appeal under section l5 of the Consumer

Protectiorr Act. 1986 against the order of the Akola District

consunrer Disputes Redressal Forum in complaint No. c.p.A./

l02lAkola/2000 passed on 5-9-2000 and received bvthe appealant

on 25-9-2000.

2. 'flris appeal is filed *,ithin the time linrit pro'ided under

scc:lion I5 ol-tlrc Colrsrrrrrcr I)rolection Act. lgtlfi.

r'

/

----'- nltq+l12e$

ATATE COTBUMER DISPUTEB REDR.EABAL COMMIBSIOil

MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BEITCH

TAGPUR

APPEAI No: 1873/2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top