i.L

I

c--{=to.^-r - &r o t- e n/ro ,/ ^ \t \a f zw

Iti" ^{--X for^".r :. -D,g n fo.^^ A1gl} ct

o"tt-y O.-\ga.^1- s- q _ 1szn3

BEFORE THE HONOUR^ABLE GONSUMER

Drs ^purEs R EDREsSAL corunnrsCro rr,

MAHARASHTRA STATE ar r,rur.aeAi

(APPELLATE JURtsDtcTtoNl

Menrorandunr of Appear under secti., l5 of the

Consumer ^protection Act. l9g6

Appcar ," --L{f ^9- or2ooo

In thcr nratter clf -

Appellant :-

Ravindra Ghanashyarn Kher

Resident of Shree I)arshan Appartnrent,

Near Siddhi Mnavak Mandir,

.latharpeth, Aliola.

-- Versus --

Respondent;- ExecutiveEngineer(tJrbanarea)

Maharashtra State Electricitv Board.

_-__-- oo

l'he nrenrorandunr ofappeal ofthe appealantabove named

rrrost respecttirlh, shorveth :

l.

'[his is alt appeal under section l5 of the Consumer

Protectiorr Act. 1986 against the order of the Akola District

consunrer Disputes Redressal Forum in complaint No. c.p.A./

l02lAkola/2000 passed on 5-9-2000 and received bvthe appealant

on 25-9-2000.

2. ^'flris appeal is filed *,ithin the time linrit pro'ided under

scc:lion I5 ol-tlrc Colrsrrrrrcr I)rolection Act. lgtlfi.

r'

/

----'- nltq+l12e$

ATATE COTBUMER DISPUTEB REDR.EABAL COMMIBSIOil

MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BEITCH

TAGPUR

APPEAI No: 1873/2Ofi)

(Arbtrg out of C.C.IIo. LO?I?OOO of D.F.A.Lotra,

'Declded on: (Xi/(X)/2(X)Of

Ravindra Ghanashynm Kher (Appellant)

v/s.

Executive Engineer, MSEB, Akola (Respondent)

ORDER

lPAssED ^{oN: r4l01 /2fi191}

Both parties are absent when called at l,2O P.M. None to represent

them. Notices were sent to the parties through UCP. Appellant's notice is

treated as deemed notice. It appea-rs that appellent is not interested in

prosecuting the matter. Today appellant is absent. Hence appeal is

dismissed for non appearance of the appellant.

Parties to bear their orrn cost of this appeal.

Copy of the order be supplied to the parties ftee of cost.

o-t

"tW'*,fu,t1{v/

l+lt /2r*1

Member

Click Here to Read the rest of this document