Appeal ^{No. 19612014}

Filed on: ^1'7.02.2014

Disposed ^{on: 08.03'201 6}

STATE co^{NSUMER DISPUTES}

BEFORE ^{THE KARNATAKA}

MMISSION. ^BAN

ORE.

REDRES^{SAL CO}

Pepsico India ^{Hotding Pvt' Ltd'}

Registered ^{Offrce at}

38; DLF Corporate ^{Park, 'S'Block}

Qutab ^{Enclave, Phase III}

Gurgaon ^l22OO2

Through authorized ^signatorY

(By Sri. Gerald ^Manoharan)

V/s

Rithu Jain

R/at B-504, ^{AiswarYa ExcellencY}

Opposite Tin ^Factory

K.R. Puram, ^{Old Madra Roacl}

Bangalore ^{5600 16}

(ByIn-person)

oRDER

Mr. B.S. TADAHAL. ^{JUDICIAL MDMBER}

The appeiiant/OP ^{No. 2 has preferred this appeal being}

aggrieved by ^{the order passed in CC' No' 834/2013 dated}

31.10.2013 ^{by the I Addl. Bangalore Urban District Consumer}

Disputes Redressai ^{Forum, Bangalore'}

We sha1l refer ^{to the parties as per the rankings before the}

PRESENT

HON'BLE ^{MTS' JUSTICE B.S. INDRAKALA : PRESIDENT}

MT. B.S. TADAHAL

: JUDICIAL ^MDMBER

Mrs. G.T. VIJAYALAKSHMI

: MEMBER

Ap^peal No. ^t9612014

Appellant

......Respondent

District Forum.

Lo.-*r''-

DATED ^{THIS THE OSthDAY OF MARCH 2016}

2

Appeal No. 19612014

3. The brief facts of the case are as under:

The respondent/ complainant filed this complaint praying to

pay compensation and to review the license of the manufacturing

Kolhapur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document