SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1 A/1341/2019

Date of filing :29.07.2019

Date of order :24.02.2021

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE

REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, BENCH AT

AURANGABAD.

FIRST APPEAL NO. : 1341 OF 2019

IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 304 OF 2018

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM : AURANGABAD.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd,.

Jeevan Suman, LIC Building, N-5, Plot No.3,

CIDCO, Jalgaon raod, Aurangabad.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd,.

Through its Authorized signatory,

Mahesh Compound, Adalat road,

Aurangabad.

APPELLANT

VERSUS

M/s Navjeevan Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd,.

Through Mr.Anil Kashinath Bharadkar,

Sidharth Complex, Railway Station road,

Aurangabad.

RESPONDENT

CORAM :

Smt.S.T.Barne, Hon`ble Presiding Judicial

Member.

Mr.K.M.Lawande, Hon’ble Member.

Present :

Adv.M.R.Deshmukh for appellant,

Adv.A.B.Katkar for respondent.

J U D G M E N T

(Delivered on 24/02/2021)

Per Smt.S.T.Barne, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member.

2 A/1341/2019

1. This appeal is arising out of judgment and order in C.C.No.

304/2018 decided by District Consumer Forum, Aurangabad on

28.6.2019. the appellant New India Assurance Company Ltd,. is the

opponent and respondent M/s Navjeevan Hatchery Pvt. Ltd,. is the

complainant in the original complaint before District Consumer

Forum. They are hereinafter, referred as per their status in the

complaint before District Consumer Forum. The complainant is

having his business office at Sidharth Complex, Railway Station road,

Aurangabad. The complainant secured insurance policy for its

workers/employee bearing policy number 1604003616100000455

with effect from 31.3.2017 till 30.3.2018.

2. It is case of complainant that one Bhimrao Banduji Sasane was

working as a watchman at the head office of complainant. On

26.11.2017 he met with an accident while he was on duty. He

sustained grievous head injury and bodily injury. He was immediately

shifted to the hospital and he died on 29.11.2017 due to Acute

Myocardial Infarction. There was fracture to his skull on right and

left side and there was internal bleeding. Thus, he sustained brain

injury and died out of it’s complication. It was immediately informed

to opponent Insurance Company on his death by e-mail dated

29.12.2017. The opponent sought documents by letter dated

22.2.2018 for settlement of claim. However, on 19.6.2018 the

opponent repudiated the claim of complainant without perusing the

entire medical record and thereby caused deficiency in service.

Hence, the complainant filed consumer complaint before District

Consumer Forum.

3 A/1341/2019

3. The respondent Insurance company has filed it’s reply. The

copy of same is at page No. 54 to 61. The opponent has not disputed

that the complainant has secured insurance policy under Worksman

Compensation Act. It is the contention of complainant that deceased

Bhimrao Sasane died on 29.11.2017, due to Acute Myocardial

Infarction i.e. due to heart attack which is not covered under the

policy. There is no relation between employment and cause of death.

The complainant failed to intimate the accident to labour officer or

Worksman

compensation

Commissioner

within

jurisdiction.

Therefore, it can be inferred that the accident is not occurred during

the course of employment of complainant. The District Consumer

Forum has no jurisdiction to decide or adjudicate the claim of

employer and employee relationship in the present complaint. The

opponent has rightly repudiated the claim on the basis of post

mortem report, wherein the cause of death is mentioned as “Acute

Myocardial Infarction Associated With I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top