SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2/3/2021

Daily Order

1/1

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

MAHARASHTRA STATE,

CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

First Appeal No. A/19/1524

(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/03/2019 in Case No. 17/93 of District Beed)

SHASHIKALA ARJUN DALVI

SHIRISH ARJUNRAO DALVI

Vs.

MANAGER, THE BEED

DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-

OPRATIVE BANK LTD and

Others

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MS. S.T.BARNE PRESIDING MEMBER

PRESENT:S S DALVI, Advocate for the Appellant 1

Dated : 03 Feb 2021

Order

Heard appellant Shirish Arjunrao Dalvi in person. He has submitted that, District Consumer

Forum has decided C.C.No.93/2017 and 94/2017 on 07.03.2019 with directions to respondent to

make compliance of order within 1 month. He has also filed execution petition against

respondent. However, respondent has not complied the order. Hence, he has preferred this

appeal.

It is apparent that this appeal is filed by appellant No.1 Smt.Shashikala Arjun Dalvi / ori.

complainant and respondent No.2 Mr.Shirish Dalvi respondent No.2/ ori. complainant. District

Consumer Forum has already decided their complaint No. C.C.No. 93/2017 and 94/2017 on

07.03.2019. It reveals from appeal memo and prayer clause, the appeallant is seeking remedy

for compliance of said order of District Consumer fourm in C.C. No. 93/2017 & 94/2017.

Therefore, remedy for non compliance of said order is to proceed in accordance with Sec. 25 &

27 of Consumer Protection Act,1986. As per appellant he has already filed proceeding against

respondent. Hence, appeal for compliance of order or as prayed in appeal memo is not

maintainable. Hence, this appeal is disposed off.

[HON'BLE MS. S.T.BARNE]

PRESIDING MEMBER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top