RESERVED
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
UTTAR PRADESH, LUCKNOW
APPEAL NO. 2484 OF 2003
(Against judgment and order dated 20-08-2003 in Complaint
Case No. 174/2002 of the District Consumer Forum-II, Bareilly )
- M/s Kipps Motors Private Limited
Through its Director
179, Civil Lines, Bareilly.
- Ashok Khadelwal, (Dead)
S/o Sri Bhishambar Nath Khandelwal
Director
M/s Kipps Motors Private Limited
35A Rampur Garden, Bareilly.
2/1. Aman Jasoria
S/o Late Ashok Khandelwal
R/o 35-A/4 Rampur Garden, Bareilly.
- Pramod Khandelwal
S/o Late Ram Ratan Khandelwal
35L/3B Rampur Garden, Bareilly
...Appellants
Vs.
- Sri Vipin Kumar Jain, Advocate
S/o Late D C Jain
405 Mamaran Beharipur, Bareilly.
02.M/s Daewoo Motors India Limited
Through its Managing Director
A-1 Soorajpur Industrial Area, Noida
Dadri Road, Soorajpur 203207
District Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.
03.M/s Daewoo Motors India Limited
Through its Managing Director
Registered Office 33 Shri Fort Road
New Delhi 110049
04.M/s Exide Industries Limited
Through its Managing Director
Exide House
59E Chaurangee Road, Kolkata.
...Respondents
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR, PRESIDENT
HON’BLE MR. VIKAS SAXENA, MEMBER
:2:
For the Appellant No.1&2 : Sri Ashok Sinha, Advocate.
For the Appellant No.3 : Sri R K Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.01 : Sri Abhinav Bhattacharya, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.04 : Sri Subeer Sarkar, Advocate.
Dated : 10-09-2021
JUDGMENT
PER MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR, PRESIDENT
This is an appeal filed under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 against the judgment and order dated 20-08-2003 passed by the District Consumer Commission-II, Bareilly in Complaint Case No. 174 of 2002 Vipin Kumar Jain, Advocate V/s M/s Daewoo Motors India Limited and others.
Heard learned Counsel for the appellant No. 01 and 02 Sri Ashok Sinha, Sri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned Counsel on behalf of appellant No.03, Sri Abhinav Bhattacharya on behalf of the complainant/respondent No.01 and Sri Subeer Sarkar, learned Counsel on behalf of respondent No.04 and perused the record.
The brief facts of the case are that the respondents No.02 and 03, M/s Daewoo Motors India Limited are the manufacturers of four wheeler vehicle under the brand name of Matiz. The respondent No.01 in the instant appeal is the complainant who has purchased a Matiz Car from the authorized dealer, the appellant No.01 M/s Kipps Motors Private Limited of which the appellants No. 02 and 03 are/were the owners/Directors.
The aforesaid Matiz car was purchased by the complainant/respondent No.01 from the appellant No.01 on 12-09-2000 and the same was used by the complainant/respondent No.01 for about more than 21 months and it was run more than 20250 kilometres.
On 26-06-2002 a complaint has been registered/lodged by the respondent