SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

Cause Title/Judgement-Entry
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCH
NAGPUR
 
First Appeal No. A/20/1
( Date of Filing : 03 Jan 2020 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/64/2018 of District Chandrapur)
 
1. SHRIMATI KANTA W.O. BANDU DHAWAS
R.O. NAGLONE TAH. BHADRAVATI DIST. CHANDRAPUR
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER DHANRAJ PLAZA, M.G. ROAD, CHADRAPUR .
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
2. M.S. CABAL INSURANCE BROKING SERVICE LTD.
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER OFF. 401 C, GREEN LAWN APPARTMENT , KAPDA BAZAR , MAHIM MUMBAI .
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
3. TALUKA KRISHI ADHIKARI BHADRAVATI.
TAH. BHADRAVATI DIST. CHANDRAPUR .
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/20/3
( Date of Filing : 03 Jan 2020 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/46/2018 of District Chandrapur)
 
1. SHRIMATI KAUSALYABAI WD.O. MEGHRAJ DUKRE .
R.O. AMBMAKTA TAH. WARORA , DIST. CHANDRAPUR .
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER , DHANRAJ PLAZA, M.G. ROAD , CHANDRAPUR
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
2. M.S. CABAL INSURANCE BROKING SERVICE LTD.
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER OFF. 401 C, GREEN LAWN APPARTMENT , KAPDA BAZAR , MAHIM MUMBAI
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
3. TALUKA KRISHI ADHIKARI WARORA
TAH. WARORA DIST. CHANDRAPUR
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/20/4
( Date of Filing : 03 Jan 2020 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/67/2018 of District Chandrapur)
 
1. SHRIMATI SHILABAI WD.O. SABHAJI THAKRE
R.O. ASHTI TUKUM TAH. BHADRAVATI DIST. CHANDRAPUR .
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER DHANRAJ PLAZA, M.G. ROAD, CHADRAPUR
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
2. M.S. CABAL INSURANCE BROKING SERVICE LTD.
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER OFF. 401 C, GREEN LAWN APPARTMENT , KAPDA BAZAR , MAHIM MUMBAI .
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
3. TALUKA KRISHI ADHIKARI BHADRAVATI.
TAH. BHADRAVATI DIST. CHANDRAPUR
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.K. KAKADE PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. A. Z. KHWAJA JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

AS PER HON'BLE MR. DR. S.K. KAKADE PRESIDING MEMBER

       Aggrieved by the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Chandrapur, in Consumer complaint No.CC/64/2018 by which the complaint was dismissed, this appeal is filed by Smt.Kanta Bandu Dhavas, original complainant against the Oriental Insurance Company LTD, Chandrapur, M/s Cabal Insurance Broking Services Ltd, Mumbai, and Taluka Krishi Adhikari, Bhadravati, Dist.Chandrapur, original opposite parties.

  1. Brief facts of this appeal are as follows:

     The son of the appellant, deceased Arvind Bandhu Dhavas met with an accident on 16th November 2008 as he was dashed by a speeding vehicle coming from the opposite side and subsequently died. The claim under Farmers Janata Personal Insurance policy was submitted by the appellant to respondent no. 3, Taluka Krishi Adhikari, being the lone legal heir as the deceased was unmarried. In spite of filing an application along with documents with respondent no. 3, the said claim was not settled and the appellant, the original complainant did not receive the compensation though she was covered by this insurance, being a farmer. Aggrieved by inaction on the part of respondents, the appellant had filed a complaint case no. CC/64/2018, before learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum of Chandrapur.

  1. 3.    The complaint case no. 64 of 2018 filed by Srimati Kanta Bandhu Dhavas against the original opposite party the Oriental Insurance Company Limited was decided by the learned forum on 10thOctober 2019 after following a judicial proceeding. District Consumer Forum dismissed the complaint on the ground that the complaint was barred by limitation and that it was the complainant who did not file complete docu



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top