(Delivered on 21/12/2021)
PER SHRI A. Z. KHWAJA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER.
1. Appellant- Union Bank of India has preferred the present appeal feeling aggrieved by the order dated 19/10/2020 passed by the learned District Consumer Commission, Nagpur in Consumer Complaint No. CC/8/2020 whereby the complaint filed by the complainant came to be partly allowed. (Appellant and respondent shall hereinafter be referred as per original nomenclature)
2. Short facts leading to filing of the present appeal may be narrated as under,
Complainant –Mr. Ashok Eknathji Lambat has claimed that he was resident of Nagpur and was having saving account in O.P. bank bearing No. 517202010015273 and also was having RuPay Debit Card issued by the O.P.- bank bearing Card No. 6069925172036637. Complainant has alleged that on 18/07/2018 at 11.35 p.m. he received message on his mobile regarding the withdrawal of amount of Rs. 10,000/- and Rs. 5000/- in total Rs. 15,000/-. But in fact he had not withdrawn the said amount. On 19/07/2018 he approached to O.P. bank and made enquiry and came to know that on 18/07/2018 an amount of Rs. 50,000/- was withdrawn from his account but he had received the massages of withdrawal of an amount of Rs. 15,000/-. Complainant has alleged that he had given an application for closing of account and ATM Card. Complainant has contended that after submitting the application for closing of account and ATM Card facility on the same day i.e. on 19/07/2018 he again received the message that an amount of Rs. 24,000/- and Rs. 169/- was withdrawn by swiping his debit card and so he again approached to the O.P.-Bank and enquired about the said withdrawal of amount but he was informed that his account and debit card has been freezed. Complainant has alleged that he had not made any transaction and loss was caused to him on account of deficiency in service of the O.P.-Bank. Complainant has alleged that he lodged the complaint with Police Authority and also with the Reserve Bank of India on 26/09/2018. Complainant has contended that the O.P.-Bank had deposited the said amount in his account as ATM Fraud amount by marking the lien. Complainant further contended that thereafter the O.P-Bank has taken out the said amount from his account on 30/06/2018. Complainant has therefore, contended that the loss was caused to him due to deficiency in service on behalf of the O.P. –Bank. Complainant therefore, lodged the complaint before the learned District Consumer Commission, Nagpur and prayed for return of amount Rs. 74,169/- as well as amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- towards mental agony along with interest and Rs. 25,000/- towards litigation charges.
3. After filing of the complaint due notice was issued on the O.P.-Bank/appellant and same was duly served. However, none appeared on behalf of the O.P.-bank and so complaint proceeded exparte against the O.P.-Bank.
4. The learned District Consumer Commission, Nagpur thereafter went through the