APPEAL No.233/2021
Date of Filing : 09.03.2021
Date of Disposal : 19.03.2021
BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
DATED: 19th MARCH 2021
PRESENT
Mr KRISHNAMURTHY B. SANGANNANAVAR: JUDICIAL MEMBER
Mrs DIVYASHREE M: LADY MEMBER
APPEAL NO.233/2021
Mr.Make My Trip (India) Pvt. Ltd.,
Having Office at The Centrum
2nd Floor, Near Safina Plaza
Infantry Road, Land Mark
Opp. Prestige Cooper Arch
Bengaluru-560 001
Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Appellant
(By Mr.Narasimhan S)
-Versus-
Mr.Shanmukha P
S/o Puttappa
Aged about 26 years
Residing at No.408
Suavity Amuulya Apartment
Kammasandra Main Road
Electronic City, 2nd Phase
Bangalore-560 100
Respondent
-:ORDER:-
Mr.KRISHNAMURTHY B. SANGANNANAVAR: JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. This is an Appeal filed by OP under section 41 of CP Act, 2019
aggrieved by the order dated 19.12.2020 passed in Consumer
Complaint No.459/2019 passed by I Additional District Consumer
Disputes
Redressal
Commission,
Bengaluru.(for
short
District
Commission).
2. The facts in brief as stated by the complainant before the District
Commission: He had booked e-ticket from Nassau to Bengaluru using
APPEAL No.233/2021
the Booking ID:NN7269626426261 on 27.01.2019for journey on
06.06.2019 by paying a sum of Rs.66,430/- and he had received e-
ticket by confirming the journey which read as cancellation is ‘non-
refundable and dates are non-changeable’. That the complainant tries
to reach the customer care number, he provided on the Web since the
ticket was booked at night, his calls were unanswered. He spoke to the
Customer Care on 28.01.2019 and had registered a complaint. Few e-
mails were sent to the complainant confirming that e-ticket will be
refundable and that the complainant had requested the OP to resend a
fresh e-ticket bearing the words ‘refundable’ and ‘changeable’ on it.
The OP was reluctant in sending a fresh e-ticket and kept on seeking
additional time to revert. He received e-mails it was proposed to
provide a gift voucher of Rs.2,500/- which could be redeemed in future
and also stated that ticket without non-refundable and that he refused
to accept the offer. He requested several times and asked for refundable
ticket or refund of the ticket amount over mail but OP went on
postponing the issue with one or the other pretext with mala-fide
intention and therefore, OP is liable for deficiency in service.
3. In view of the alleged complaint, though OP appeared before the
District Commission did not chose to file version within 45 days from
the date of service of notice and his application seeking permission to
file version came to be rejected. Accordingly, Commission below held an
enquiry of the complaint filed by the complainant under section 12 of
the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 thereby found OP deficient in
service, thereby directed him to pay a sum of Rs.66,430/- along with
interest @ 12 p.a from 04.02.2019 and to provide refundable/re-
changeable ticket in case complainant desires and expresses in writing
to the OP. Further do pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards litigation
expenses and Rs.5,000/- as damages within 30 days from the date of
receipt of the order.
APPEAL No.233/2021
4. Now, the above order is impugned in this Appeal on the ground
that Commission below erred in appreciating the materials on record
and failed to consider the circular issued by Office of the Director
General of Civil Aviation, Government of India dated 12.05.2008, which
is liable to be set aside and the complaint against OP deserved to be
dismissed.
5. Commission heard learned counsel for Appellant/OP.
6. We have gone through the impugned order dated 19.12.2020
passed by the Commission below, thereby found Commission below,
did not considered the important document issued by the Director
General