Per Shri B.A.Shaikh, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

1.      This appeal is filed by the original opposite party (for short O.P.) Nos.1 and 2 feeling aggrieved by the order dated 30/06/2008 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Nagpur in consumer complaint No.219/2007 by which the complaint has been partly allowed.

2.      The case of the original complainant/respondent herein as set out by him in the said consumer complaint, filed before the District Forum in brief is as under.

A)      The original complainant is an employee of Central Government Employee and he works in Ordinance Factory, Khamriya, Jabalpur (M.P.). The original opposite party (for short O.P.) No.1 is a Doctor and attached to the hospital called as “Spandan Heart Institute and Research Center” Nagpur and he is also the Director of the said institute/hospital. The O.P.No.2 is also a Doctor and he is attached to the said center. The original complainant/respondent herein was suffering from IHD (Ischermic Heart Decease) and he received treatment at Netaji Subhashchandra Bose Medical College and Hospital, Jabalpur. During that treatment it was discovered that he was required Coronary Angiography. The said treatment was not available in the State of Madhya Pradesh. Therefore on 07/06/2005 he was referred to the aforesaid hospital of original O.P.Nos.1 and 2 for required treatment and further management.

B)      The complainant was admitted in the hospital of O.P.Nos.1 and 2 on 08/06/2005 and his blood test was taken and ECG was done. On 09/06/2005 he under went Coronary Angiography Test and it was found that he was suffering from Double Vessel Disease. He was advised for Coronary Angioplasty to LCX & RCA (Left Circumflex Artery and Right Coronary Artery), with stent inplantation.

C)     The complainant was then sent back to Jabalpur for making necessary arrangement. He then returned to hospital of O.P.Nos.1 and 2 on 22/06/2005 and he was admitted in that hospital on 22/06/2005. Blood test and Angioplasty was performed on 23/06/2005. The Coronary Diagram Report furnished by the O.P.Nos.1 and 2 shows that Angiography was performed to RCA only and two Drugs Eluting Stents Implantation were done. But Coronary Angioplasty to LCx was left, though it was required to be done as per certificate given, with respect to the Coronary Diagram Report dated 09/06/2005.

D)        Complainant was then kept in observation till 01/07/2005 in the hospital of O.P.Nos.1 and 2. He was discharged from that hospital on 02/07/2005, though he had pain and various other troubles. He was given a diet-prescription dated 23/06/2005, an exercise prescription dated 01/07/2005 and discharge-summary dated 02/07/2005. He was advised to report for follow up after two months.

E)        However, after only one month he again developed the same acute trouble and rushed to the hospital of O.P. at Nagpur from Jabalpur. Again his various pathological tests and other investigations were done on 03/08/2005 and he was again advised to come for review after six months. He was sent back on 03/08/2005 with fitness certificate to resume his duty with immediate effect.

F)      However on 10/10/2005 his condition again became suddenly critical and therefore he was immediately admitted in the ordnance factory hospital at Jabalpur and after primary manage