SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Daily Order

   STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Appeal No.

300 of 2017

Date of Institution

04.12.2017

Date of Decision

06.12.2017

Mrs.Sartaj wife of Shri Hafeez Ahmed resident of 1593/1, Sector 30-B, Chandigarh

                                        …..Appellant/Complainant

                                Versus

  1. Syka (in fact ‘Syska’) LED Pvt. Ltd., SCO No.109, Sector 47-C, Chandigarh through its Authorized Person.
  2. Sahni Mobile Centre, SCF No.36, Sector 28-C, Chandigarh through its Authorized Person.

                            …..Respondents/Opposite Parties.

BEFORE:   JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT

                MR. DEV RAJ, MEMBER.

                MRS. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER

Argued by:

Sh. A.K.Maleri, Advocate for the appellant/ Complainant.  

PER PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER

              This appeal is directed against the order dated 10.10.2017, rendered by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, UT, Chandigarh (in short ‘the Forum’ only), vide which, it dismissed Consumer Complaint bearing No.383 of 2017.

2.           The facts, in brief, are that the complainant purchased a mobile phone of Apple 5S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top