The Manager, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., vs Hanumanthappa

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Cause Title/Judgement-Entry

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.

First Appeal No. A/315/2013

( Date of Filing : 15 Mar 2013 )

(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/03/2013 in Case No. EP/8/2012 of District Koppal)

1. The Manager, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.,

Near Head Post Office, Koppal

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. Hanumanthappa

S/o. Yankappa Vaddar, Aged 38 years, Occ: Private Work, R/o. Kolihal, Tq. Yelaburga, Dist. Koppal .

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar PRESIDING MEMBER
	HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi MEMBER

PRESENT:

Dated : 04 Aug 2021

Final Order / Judgement

Appellant/s

1 . The Manager, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., .
Near Head Post Office, Koppal
(By P.N. Rajeswara)

-Versus-

Respondent/s

1 . Hanumanthappa .
S/o. Yankappa Vaddar, Aged 38 years, Occ: Private Work, R/o. Kolihal, Tq. Yelaburga, Dist. Koppal .
(By N.P.Singri)

04.08.2021

ORDER

Mr. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. The appellant/Opposite Party filed this appeal way back in the year 2013 being aggrieved by the Order dt.04.03.2013 passed in Criminal Complaint (EP) No.08/2012 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Koppal wherein the District Commission allowed the complaint which directed the Accused/Opposite Party to undergo one month simple imprisonment and also to pay Rs.2,000/- to the complainant. In defult of making payment of the fine amount, the accused shall suffer further imprisonment for a period of one week.

2. The appellant not appeared before this Commission inspite of giving sufficient opportunities to address his arguments and to convince how the impugned order passed by the District Commission is not satisfactory and against to law.

3. The case called twice, appellant not present.

4. We have perused the appeal memo. Mere memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant. As such, the appeal requires to be dismissed. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

The amount in deposit if any shall be transmitted to the District Commission for needful action.

Forward free copies to both parties.

Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

KCS*

[HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar]

PRESIDING MEMBER

[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi]

MEMBER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document