STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                  BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH            ::    PRESIDENT                       

                                                      Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

                                                                                                    FA. No. 316/2012

(Against the order in C.C. No., 86/2004,  dated 25.3.2011, on the file of

District Consumer Forum ,Salem

DATED THE 13^TH  DAY OF APRIL 2022

1.Dr.V.Siddharthan,

Consultant opthalmologis,

Vitero Retinal Surgeon,

T.M.S, Eye Hospital,

51, L.R.N. Colony,

Sarada college Road, Salem – 636 007    

2. M/s Indian Medical Association,

Professional protection Linked,

Social security Scheme, Sarada College,

Main Road, Five Roads, Salem – 5                       ..Appellants/opposite parties

                                              Vs

1.A.Venkatachalam, (died)

S/o alagappa padayachi,

Opp.to Petrol Bunk, Bommidi PO,

Dharmapuri District,

Temporarily, residing at

No.16, ATC Nagar, Dasanaickenpatty post,

Salem Taluk.

2. Kandhamani,

W/o Venkatachalam,

3. V.Sampathkumar,

S/o Venkatachalam,

Judicial Officers Quarters,

Taluk office compound, Omalur PO & Tk  

4. V.Sukumar,

S/o Venkatachalam,

Nos. 2 & 4 are residing at

Opp. Petrol Bundk, Bommidi, Pappiereddi,

Patty Taluk, Dharmapuri District 

5. V.Sekar,

S/o Venkatachalam,

No. 16, ATC Nagar, Dasanaickenpatty post,

Salem Taluk,

6. V.Ravikumar,

S/o Venkatachalam,

150, Kamaraj Nagar,

12^th Ward, Omalur post and Taluk,

Salem District                                            ..Respondents complainants

Counsel for the Appellants/opposite parties         : M/s AAV Partners

Counsel for the R1 (Amicus Curie)                      : M/s V.Balaji

     This appeal coming before us for hearing today for appearance of R1 and for reporting settlement and for filing joint memo of compromise or for arguments, this commission made the following order in open court :

                                                Docket order

    Both present. Today when the matter is taken into consideration, both parties were present and a memo has been filed, stating that the matter has been amicably settled between them.

    In view of the above memo, the appeal is disposed off.

   Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit along with accrued interest to the appellant.

Sd/-                                                                                                                        Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                       R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                                      PRESIDENT