SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:

ORISSA:CUTTACK.

First Appeal No. 10 of 2011

in the matter of

An appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer

Protection Act. 1986 and Rules framed thereunder

And

!n the matter of

An application challenging the exparte Judgment

dtd. 28.07.2011 passed by the learned District

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mayurbhanj

in C. D. Case No. 50 of 2008 :

And

in the matter of

Divisional Manager,

National Insurance Co. Ltd., DIViSION -

IIl

8, Indian Exchange Place (Gr. Floor)

Kolkata - 700 001

represented through Officer-in-Charge

Orissa Legal Cell,

Cantonment Road, Cuttack

(Opp. party No. 1 in the Forum below)

...Appellant

- Versus

A dv.

Sri Ananta Kumar Sahu.

S/o. Khageswar Sahu,

At.-Mendhakhai, W.No. 9.

P.O./P S.- Udala,

Dist.- Mayurbhanj.

(Complainant in the Forum below)

1. 2

Branch Manager

Golden Multi Services Clubs of G.T.F.S.,

Balasore, Near Chidiapolo,

AtUP.O./P.S/Dist.- Balasore.

(Opp. party no. 1 in the Forum below)

Respondents

The matter out of which this appeal arises was never

before this Hon'ble Commission in any manner

earlier

21 St. No.

of Order

Date of

Order

Office note as to action (if any),

taken on Order

ORDER wITH SIGNATURE

Dt.20.07.2022

F.A. 590/2011

Ilearned counsel for the appellant is present..

Respondent is absent on repeated calls.

Heard the learned counsel of Appellant at|length.

This is an appeal filed by the insurer (QP. No.1), challenging

an ex-parte judgment for payment of sum assured of Rs. 1 lakh.

is that the

The case of the Complainant/Resppndent

His

Complainaht is the son and nominee of deceased |Usharani Sahu.

deceased fhther Late Khageswar Sahu had obtained an insurance policy

covered

under Group Janata Personal Accidest Insurance Scheme"

along with| Late Usharani Sahu. Late Usharani Sahu, being a member of

Golden Milti Services Club of GTFS, Balasore ohtained the said policy

bearing N). 100300/47/01/9600022/02/96/30307 which was valid from

15-12-200? to 14.12.2017 (Annexure-1 to the complaint petition). The

sum assured under the said policy was Rs.1,00,p00/- for herself and

Rs.1,00,00/- for Khageswar Sahu.

On 09.10.2006, Usharani Sahu died due to a fire accident.

The complainant being the nominee submitted the laim before O.P No.2

OGP-MP-CTCP (FS&CW) 2-1,00,000-29-6-2020

SI. No

of Order

Date of

Office note as to action (if any)

taken on Order

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE

Order

with allfelevant papers on 24.4.2007 for sett|ement of claim. The

Opposite Parties did not settle the claim inspite of several approaches,

hence he fled the case before the learned forum below

The Opposite Party No.1/Appellant No.l did not appear and

was set ex-parte.

The Opposite Party No.2 filed written version denying the

liability o pay any insurance claim. According to O.P No.2, National

Insuranc¢ Co.Ltd. is the insurer and hence is solely liable to pay the

insuranc¢ claim.

After hearing the case, the learned fprum below allowed the

complaint of the complainant and passed ex-parte judgment against O.P

No.l anl directed the O.P No.1,- National Insrance Co.Ltd.

to pay

Rs.1,00,pO0/-, the sum assured, towards insurance claim of the

complaiant along with compensation of Rs. 110,000/- towards mental

agony and harassment and cost of Rs.2,000/- within 30 days from the date

of receipt of the order, failing which the O.P shall pay interest over the

aforesail amount at the rate of 9%% per annum.

2 3

ST. No.

of Order

Office note as to action (f any).

taken on Order

Date of

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE

Order

Challenging the impugned ex-parte order, the appellant-

hw

insurancelcompany

(O.P. No.1) filed the preserft appeal.

During the course of hearing, cousel for the appellant

company submitted that the repudiation of clairn was made with due

regard to the terms of contract of policy. The appellant company was

never notced in the case by the learned forum below and the judgment

was pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top