SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

Consumer Complaint No.CC/07/53

1.Mr.Hatim Shaikh

2.Mr.Shekhar Naidu

3.Mr.Khan M Ahmed

4.Mr.Usman A.Qureshi

5.Mr.Majoj A.Kumar

6.Mr.Atul H.Kharkar

7.Mr.&Mrs.V.N.Hule

8.Mr.B.V.Shetty

9.Mr.Vivek Pawar

10.Mr.Rahul & Ritika Tapasvi

11.Mr.Mohd.Arif Khalil Ahmed

12.Mr.Neela Kantan

13.Mr.Joel S.Ghosalkar

14.Ms.Leena Sequeira

15.Mr.Ganesh Shetty

16.Mr.Nandkumar B.Yadav

17.Dr.Abdul G.Khan

18.Mr.P.R.Iyengar

19.Mr.Khan Kalamulla

20.Mr.K.Ramchandra Moorthy

21. Mr.Ansari Kalam Hussain

22.Dr.Mrs.A.K.Pradhan

23.Mr.Khan Iqbal Hussain

24.Dr.Meena Rajurkar

25.Mr.& Mrs.Manohar Chetty

26.Mr.Wilson Paily

27. Mr.Shehnaz Arif Chunawala

28.Mr.Sayeed Ahmed Khan

29.Mr.Sadika Dabir

30.Mr.Vijay

31.Mr.Yogesh Khanna

32.Mr.RajeshH.Thadani

33.Mr.Ravikant Amin

All represented through

Mr.Khan Iqbal H.

Flat no.K-54

Mahindra Park Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd.

Narayan Nagar, LBS Marg

Ghatkopar(W), Mumbai 400 086

...........Complainants

Versus

1.Mahindra Infrastructural Projects Ltd.

Mahindra Towers, 5th floor

Dr.G.M.Bhosale Marg

Com.P.K.Kurne Chowk

Worli, Mumbai 400 018

2.Mahindra Gesco Developers Ltd.

Mahindra Towers, 5th floor

Dr.G.M.Bhosale Marg

Com.P.K.Kurne Chowk

Worli, Mumbai 400 018

3. The Chief Engineer

Building Proposal Department (Eastern Suburb),

Municipal Corporation of

Greater Mumbai, Ghatkopar(E)

Mumbai 400 075

4.The Chief Officer

Fire Brigade, Marol, Andheri(E)

Mumbai 400 059

5. Mahindra Park Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd.

Thru. Its Hon.Secretary

Mahindra Park Club House

Narayan Nagar, LBS Marg

Ghatkopar(W), Mumbai 400 086

...........Opponents

BEFORE:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. P. Bhangale, President

Hon’ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar, Member

ORAL ORDER

Per – Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. P. Bhangale, President

Complainants are remaining absent repeatedly since long. It seems that

complainants are not interested to proceed further in the matter. Hence, consumer

complaint is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Pronounced on 31st March, 2016.

[ JUSTICE A.P. BHANGALE]

PRESIDENT

[ DHANRAJ KHAMATKAR]

MEMBER

Ms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top