SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Daily Order

 IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION : DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

Date of Arguments :05.01.2018

Date of Decision :29.01.2018

Complaint No.282/2008

IN THE MATTER OF:

1. Shri Ritesh Kumar Garg,

R/o. 1226, Sector-14,

Sonepat, Haryana.

2. Smt. Aarti Garg,

R/o.  1226, Sector-14,

Sonepat, Haryana.

3. Master Kush Garg,

R/o. 1226, Sctor-14,

Sonepat, Haryana.                                                                                     …..Complainants

                                                            Versus

M/s. Max Hospital,

H.B. Twin Tower,

Wazirpur Distt. Centre,

Pitampura, New Delhi-110034.

(Through its Superintendent Dr. Ravi Shanker)                                …..Opposite Party

HON’BLE SH. O.P.GUPTA, MEMBER(JUDICIAL)

HON’BLE SH. ANIL SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER

1.     Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?                    Yes

2.      To be referred to the reporter or not?                                                                     Yes

Present:           Shri  N. Prabhakar, Counsel for the complainant.

                        Shri Sajad Sultan, counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top