FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH.
Consumer Complaint No.1089 of 2017
Date of Institution : 18.12.2017
Order Reserved on : 25.01.2019
Date of Decision : 04.02.2019
Surinder Juneja s/o Sh. Sardar Singh Juneja residing at 3800, ANDERSON STREET, WHITBY,ONTARIO, LIR 3JI CANADA, through his Special Power of Attorney Holder namely Sh. Atul Narang, B-12, Vishrantika Apartment, Sector 3, Plot No.5-A, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075.
….Complainant
Versus
….Opposite parties
Consumer Complaint U/s 17(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (as amended up to date).
Quorum:-
Shri J. S. Klar, Presiding Judicial Member.
Shri. Rajinder Kumar Goyal, Member.
Present:-For the complainant : Sh.Mukand Gupta, Advocate
For opposite parties no.1&3 : Sh. Munish Goel, Advocate
For opposite party no.2 : Ex-parte.
J. S. KLAR, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
The complainant has filed this complaint through his special power of attorney holder Atul Narang U/s 17(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 (in short the "Act) against OPs on the allegations, that since he is a person of Indian origin in his old age and he was desirous of a residential house in his native land so that he and his wife could settle here in the evening of his life. Believing the assurances of OPs, he booked residential unit A-131 for total sale consideration of Rs.19,90,000/- on 15.01.2008. He paid to OPs 2610 US dollars equivalent to Rs.1 lac in Indian currency through cheque dated 15.01.2008. He further paid amount of Rs.6,00,000/- on 30.03.2008 and Rs.12,90,000/- on 30.01.2009 through cheques to OPs also for the above purpose. Buyers agreement was also executed between them on 18.02.2008 in the office of OP no.2 at Taranto Canada. As per clause 10.1 of the buyers agreement, OPs were to deliver the possession of the unit within a period of 21 months from the date of execution of buyers agreement. The stipulated period of delivery of possession was on or before 18.11.2009. He contacted OPs many times for ascertaining the progress of his booked unit through sending emails, but to no effect. After many years, he found that nobody was present at the site and OP no.3 became untraceable. He found no development work to have been done by OPs, despite payment of large money by him to them for possession of above unit by developing the project. OPs just exploited him by mis-utilizing his money without developing the project, where allotted unit was located. He has filed the complaint praying for below noted reliefs against OPs:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.