SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Daily Order

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

                                                             Date of Decision: 21.07.2017

Complaint Case No. 405/2011

In the matter of:

  1. Sh. Prafull Vinod

S/o Ram Vinod Shahi

R/o Shahi Apartment

GobarShahi Chowk

Muzaffarpur, Bihar-842001

  1. Smt. Savita Sharma

W/s Prafull Vinod

R/o C/o B K Sharma

New Krishna Bhawan Club Road

Mittaanpura, Muzaffarpur

Bihar-842001                                             ........Complainants

Versus

            Parsvnath Developers Ltd.

(Through its Managing Director)

Regd. Office-6th Floor

Arunachal Building

19, Barakhamba Road

New Delhi-110001                                            ..........Opposite Party

CORAM

N P KAUSHIK                         -                  Member (Judicial)

1.         Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?                   Yes

2.         To be referred to the reporter or not?                                                                  Yes

N P KAUSHIK – MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

JUDGMENT

  1.         Complainant-1 Sh. Prafull Vinod and Complainant no. 2 Smt. Savita Sharma who happened

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top