SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

CC14/2021

Date of filing :21.10.2021

Date of Disposal:25.10.2021

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL

COMMISSION,MUMBAI, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

Consumer Complaint NO. : 14 OF 2021

Mahesh Rajeshwar Domshetwar,

R/o Padmaja City, Nanded,

Tq. & Dist.Nanded

…COMPLAINANT

VERSUS

Rama Developers, Nanded,

Through its Proprietor,

Shri.Chaitanya Ganesh Farkande,

R/o Farande Nagar , Nanded,

Tq. & Dist.Nanded.

…OPPONENT

CORAM :

Smt.S.T.Barne, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial

Member.

Mr.K.M.Lawande, Hon’ble Member.

Present :

Adv.Prasad D.Jarare for Complainant.

O R D E R

(Delivered on 25/10/2021)

Per Smt.S.T.Barne, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member.

Adv.Jarare for complainant present. Matter is for hearing before

admission. We inquired with him as to what valuation is given for the purpose of

deciding the pecuniary jurisdiction as the same was kept blank on page No.7 of

complaint. He has submitted that complainant agreed to purchase each bunglow

for Rs.40 lakhs. Therefore, on agreed total consideration of three bunglows the

claim is valued for Rs.1,20,00,000/-. Therefore, his attention is drawn towards

the provisions of Sec.34 and 47 of Consumer Protection Act 2019. He has fairly

conceded that in the case in hand actual consideration paid is Rs.36 lakhs and

therefore he be permitted to withdraw the complaint and to present the same

before appropriate forum. He has also requested to refund of court fees.

CC14/2021

On going through Section 47 it clearly reveals that the jurisdiction of

State Commission to entertain the claim is as specified in Sub-Section 1(a)(i)

which states that “where the value of the goods or services paid as consideration,

exceeds rupees one crore, but does not exceed rupees ten crores”. In the case in

hand, it is fairly conceded that actual consideration paid Rs.36 lakhs. Therefore it

will be just and proper to return the complaint for proper presentation before

appropriate forum having pecuniary jurisdiction. The court fee be refunded in

accordance with rules if any prescribed.

Sd/-

Sd/-

Mr.K.M.Lawande

Smt.S.T.Barne,

Member

Presiding Judicial Member

MBM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top