SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1 (CC/15/239)

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.CC/15/239

Chembur Abhay Co.Op.

Hsg.Society Ltd.,

Through Hon. Secretary

Mr.Ashok Shriram Kerkar

Having address at-

81, Tilak Nagar,

Chembur,

Mumbai 400 089.

Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Right Channel Constructions

Pvt. Ltd.

Through its Director

Mr.Devendra Hanumanprasad Pandey

101, 1st floor, Kailash Ram Kripa,

Plot No.6, Kailashpuri Road,

Upper Govind Nagar,

Malad(E), Mumbai 400 097.

Opponent(s)

BEFORE:

D.R.Shirasao, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

Dr.S.K.Kakade, Hon’ble Member

PRESENT:

For the Advocate Supriya Patil a/w

Complainant(s): Advocate Uday Wavikar

For the

Opponent(s): None present

JUDGMENT

Per: Mr.D.R.Shirasao, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member-

2 (CC/15/239)

[1]

Complainant society has filed this consumer complaint for getting

building completion certificate and occupancy certificate from opponent

alongwith other monetary relief. Brief facts of the case are as under-

[2]

Complainant is a Co-operative Housing Society registered under the

Maharashtra

Co-operative

Societies

Act,

1960 having

registration

No.BOM/WN/GSG(OH)/1318/1984-85. Members of the society unanimously

decided to give building of the society for redevelopment to opponent.

Accordingly, Development Agreement was executed in between complainant

society and opponent. As per the Development Agreement, opponent had

promised to give newly constructed building to the complainant society after

obtaining occupancy certificate from concerned authority within a period of 24

months from getting commencement certificate. Accordingly, opponent

constructed 84 flats in two wings, Wing A and Wing B, each consisting of 42

flats and there are 19 shops in the outer periphery of the premises. At the time

of handing over possession of new flats, opponent collected amount of

Rs.6,75,169/- towards property taxes, amount of Rs.12,66,560/- towards water

and electricity meter deposit, total amounting to Rs.19,41,729/-. However,

opponent had not used that amount for the said purpose. Opponent had also

collected amount of Rs.3,90,000/- towards maintenance charges from members

of the society. Opponent had collected excess amount of Rs.2,57,000/- from

members of the society towards maintenance charges. Complainant society also

required to pay sewerage tax of RS.26,59,190/-. Complainant society also

required to deposit water charges of Rs.18,52,127/- at double rate. Complainant

society was required to pay water connection charges of Rs.4,22,250/- to the

M.C.G.M. for lying water connection. It is the contention of the complainant

society that as occupancy certificate and building completion certificate is yet to

be obtained by the opponent, opponent is required to bear all these amounts and

complainant is entitled for reimbursement of these amounts from opponent. It is

3 (CC/15/239)

the contention of the complainant society that as opponent has not obtained

building completion certificate and occupancy certificate till filing of this

consumer complaint, they are entitled to get compensation in that respect from

the opponent alongwith costs and compensation.

[3]

After admission of consumer complaint notice was issued to the

opponent. However, nobody appeared for opponent to contest the consumer

complaint. Hence, by passing order on 12/06/2015, this Commission directed to

proceed this complaint exparte against opponent. Thereafter, complainant

society filed affidavit of evi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top