SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

(PUNE CIRCUIT BENCH)

COMPLAINT NO.CC/15/355

Kumar Princetown Co-operative Housing Society

Ltd.,

Having office at:

Sr.No.9, Undri, Tal.Haveli,

District Pune, through its Chairman/Secretary/

Authorised Signatory,

1. Mr.Phijo Jacob,

2. Mr.Mohasin Inamdar.

....... Complainant/

Versus

1. Manikchand Kumar Properties,

Having office at:

Kumar Capital, 1st Floor,

2413, Gen.Thimayya Road,

Old Eat Stree, Camp, Pune 411 001.

2. Shri Prakash Rasiklal Dhariwal.

3. Shriu Kevalkumar Kesarimal Jain.

……Opponent(s)

BEFORE:

Justice S.P. Tavade - President

S.T. Barne – Judicial Member

ORAL ORDER

(26th August, 2022

Per Hon’ble Justice S.P. Tavade – President:

This is Virtual/Video Conferencing hearing.

The link is proper. The conversion is audible. Soft copy of the

compilation is placed before us.

Mr.Shrinivasan, Authorised representative of the complainant company

is present. Advocate Kumbhar is present for the opponent.

Authorised Representative of the complainant company has submitted

application for withdrawal of complainant. He has also filed resolution passed

by the Company. Opponents are present along with advocate. They have no

objection for withdrawal of the complaint. Advocate for the opponents submits

that matter is settled between the parties and therefore, they have no objection

for withdrawal of the complaint. Hence, complaint is disposed of as withdrawn.

[Justice S.P. Tavade]

President

[S.T. Barne]

Judicial Member

emp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top