SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1 (CC/16/1231)

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.16/1231

1. Mr.Manish Nanji Faria

R/o 302, Orchid White CHSL,

10th Road, Khar (W),

Mumbai – 400 052.

……Complainant

Versus

1. M/s. Vaidehi Akash Housing Pvt. Ltd.,

Through its Directors

101, Saptarshi CHS Ltd.,

Behind Madhuban Society,

Barfiwala College Lane,

D.N. Nagar, Andheri (West),

Mumbai – 400 053.

2. Mr.G.S. Phondekar,

Managing Director of

The Opponent No.1

101, Saptarshi CHS Ltd.,

Behind Madhuban Society,

Barfiwala College Lane,

D.N. Nagar, Andheri (West),

Mumbai – 400 053.

3. Mrs.Rekha Shinde

Director of the Opponent No.1

101, Saptarshi CHS Ltd.,

Behind Madhuban Society,

Barfiwala College Lane,

D.N. Nagar, Andheri (West),

Mumbai – 400 053.

4. Mrs.Sunita Phondekar,

Managing Director of

The Opponent No.1

101, Saptarshi CHS Ltd.,

Behind Madhuban Society,

Barfiwala College Lane,

D.N. Nagar, Andheri (West),

Mumbai – 400 053.

2 (CC/16/1231)

5. Mrs.Madhavi Kerkar,

Director of the Opponent No.1

101, Saptarshi CHS Ltd.,

Behind Madhuban Society,

Barfiwala College Lane,

D.N. Nagar, Andheri (West),

Mumbai – 400 053.

6. M/s. New D. N. Nagar CHSL,

Through Chairman/Secretary,

Sagar Sahwas Colony,

Nr Water Tank, New D.N. Nagar,

Andheri (W), Mumbai – 400 053.

7. M/s. Rustomjee Reality Pvt. Ltd.,

Through its Directors,

702, Nataraj Building,

M.V. Road Junction,

Off Western Express Highway,

Andheri – E, Mumbai – 400 069.

…… Opponent Nos.1 to 7

BEFORE:

Justice S.P. Tavade, President

A.Z.Khwaja, Judicial Member

For Complainants

: AdvocateMr.A.S.Vidyarthi alongwith Advocate

Mr.Latesh Faria and Adv.Smt.A.Kondlekar

For Opponent nos.1 to 5 :Advocate Mr.BaliramKamble

For Opponent No.6

: Advocate Mr.Kiran Patil

For Opponent No.7

: Advocate Mr.S.B. Prabhavalkar alongwith

Advocate Mr.Nilesh Parte

ORDER

(Dated 10/11/2022)

Per:A.Z. Khwaja, Judicial Member

1) Complainant Mr.Manish Nanji Faria has filed present complaint under

the provision of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Brief facts leading to the

filing of the complaint may be stated as under –

Complainant Mr.Manish Nanji Faria claims to be resident of Khar (W),

Mumbai and was businessman and residing at Orchid White CHSL. Opponent

No.1-M/s.Vaidehi Akash Housing Pvt. Ltd., who are Builder and Developers

were dealing in the business of construction of houses as well as shops.

3 (CC/16/1231)

Opponent No.2 is Managing Director of opponent No.1 and the other opponents

are the Directors. Opponent No.6 is the Co-operative Housing Society,

registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Housing Society Act. Opponent

No.7-M/s.Rustomjee Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in the business as Builders and

Developers.

2) It is the case of the complainant that opponent no.1 had agreed to

redevelop the building which was in dilapidated condition and so had entered

into agreement of development with opponent no.6 on 31/12/2005. As per the

said agreement the Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority had

granted No Objection Certificate for the reconstruction of the existing building

no.2 to building no.9 after the compliance of all conditions. Bombay Municipal

Corporation had also sanctioned the plans for reconstruction of buildings. It is

further case of the complainant that in pursuance of the Development

Agreement the opponent nos.1 to 5 had issued allotment letter to him on

29/03/2008. As per the allotment letter, Flat No.1802 admeasuring 540 sq.f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top