SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CC/17/761

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

COMPLAINT NO.CC/17/761

1. RAMESH KUPPAN REDDY,

2. MR.MUTIU OMANA KUTTAN,

Both residing at:

1/A, Flat No.302, Veer Savarkar,

Hema Park, Bhandup – (East),

Mumbai 400 042.

.......Complainant(s)

Versus

SURAJ ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR,

MR.SHIRISHKUMAR RANGARAV CHAUHAN,

C-324, Vashi Plaza, Sector No.17, Vashi,

Navi Mumbai 400 705.

………opponent(s)

BEFORE:

Mr.D.R. Shirasao – Presiding Judicial Member

For the Complainant(s) : Advocate Ms.Amruta Bhangare

For the Opponent(s) : None.

ORDER

Per Hon’ble Mr.D.R. Shirasao – Presiding Judicial Member:

(1)

Complainants have filed this consumer complaint for getting possession

of flat along with other reliefs from opponent.

(2)

Brief facts of the case are as under:

Complainants booked flat with opponent bearing No.302, 3rd Floor, in

a building by name “Suraj Heritage”, admeasuring 761.76 sq.ft. built

CC/17/761

up area and 634.8 sq.ft. Carpet area, situated on Plot No.59, Sector

No.20, Kamothe, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, for total

consideration of Rs.18

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top