CC/17/867
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
Complaint No.CC/17/867
1. MR.SHEKHAR RIJHWANI,
Flat No.13, Pali Niketan CHS,
Nargis Dutt Road,
Bandra (West), Mumbai 400 050
1. MRS.SHARMISTA SHEKHAR RIJHWANI,
Flat No.13, Pali Niketan CHS,
Nargis Dutt Road,
Bandra (West), Mumbai 400 050
....... Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ERA REALTORS PVT. LTD.,
Through its Directors,
Having its Principal Office at:
Omkar House,
Off.Eastern Express Highway,
Sion Chunabhatti Signal,
Sion (East), Mumbai 400 022.
And its site office at:
Tadi Compound, Near Narmada Hall,
Off.Parekh Nagar, Malad (East),
Mumbai 400 097.
2. OMKAR REALTORS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,
Through its Directors,
Omkar House,
Off.Eastern Express Highway,
Sion Chunabhatti Signal,
Sion (East), Mumbai 400 022.
……Opponent(s)
BEFORE:
Justice S.P. Tavade - President
S.T. Barne – Judicial Member
For the Complainant(s) : Advocate Ms.Poonam Makhijani.
For the Opponent(s) : None.
CC/17/867
ORDER
(23rd August, 2022
Per Hon’ble Ms.S.T. Barne – Judicial Member:
(1)
Complainants, Mr.Shekhar Rijhwani and Mrs.Sharmista Shekhar
Rijhwani are husband and wife. They are resident of Bandra West,
Mumbai. They were in need of purchase of flat with specious
accommodation and various facilities. Therefore they approached the
opponent no.2 who assured the complainants that the flat would be ready
for occupation within eighteen months and possession would be given by
December, 2015. Believing his representation the Complainants booked
flat bearing Unit No.B-1709 on the 17th Floor of Tower B in Alta Monte
Building to be constructed at Tadi Compound at Malad (East) in Mumbai.
The total consideration of the flat was agreed to Rs.2,50,54,600/20. The
complainants have paid total amount of Rs.51,70,741/- in installments,
which works out to 20.6% of the total consideration. Since the opponents
have delayed the construction and has not given possession within
stipulated time, the complainants discussed with the opponents and
submitted letter for cancellation of booking and for refund of amount
paid. Since the opponent did not refund the money the complainants sent
them e-mail dated 22/08/2016. In reply opponents sent e-mail dated
17/11/2016 to the complainants informing that the company’s
management had been requested to approve a full refund of
Rs.51,70,741/- within a period of three months. However, the opponents
sent allotment letter dated 28/12/2016 to the complainants asking them to
agree for mortgage of land. It is the case of the complainants that there
was no agreement till this time despite of receiving more than 20%
amount by opponents out of total consideration, the opponents thereby
violated the provisions of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act. Hence, the
CC/17/867
complainants have issued letter to the opponents on 14/03/2017 to refund
the entire amount of Rs.51,70,741/-. As the opponents failed to refund
the amount the complainants approached to this Commission.
(2)
It is the contention of Complainants that cause of action arose in Mumbai
and the complainants have claimed refund of the amount paid to
opponents along with interest and compensation amounting to total sum
of Rs.79,55,076/-. Thus, this Commission has territorial jurisdiction and
pecuniary jurisdiction.
(3)
Opponents have appeared before this Commission and filed written
version. Said written version is at page nos.C-26 to C-33 of compilation.
The opponents have denied all adverse contentions in the complaint. It is
the contention of opponents that the complainants approached the
opponents somewhere on 24/02/2014 to purchase the Unit No.B-1709
ON THE 17TH Floor of Tower B in Alta Monte Building to be
constructed at Tadi Compound at Malad (East) in Mumbai. Total
consideration was agreed to Rs.2,50,54,600/-. The complainants paid
Rs.7,00,000/- on 24/02/201