SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

CC/17/872 1

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.CC/17/872

Mr.Sanjay Bhagwan Singh,

Mrs.Gulabodevi Bhagwan Singh,

Address at : 301, Dimple Corner, Sector 8-A,

Airoli, Navi Mumbai 400 708.

...........Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Ishaadit Enterprises,

Regd.office at : Shop No.27, Laxmi Narayan

Complex, Sector-12, Koperkhairane,

Navi Mumbai 400 709

Through its partners

1. Mr.Pavan M. Agarwal,

2. Mr.Nitin Joisar

............Opponent(s)

BEFORE:

Hon’ble Dr.S.K.Kakade, Presiding Member

For the Complainant:

Adv.Poonam Makhijani

For the Opponent/s:

None

ORAL ORDER

Per Hon’ble Dr.S.K.Kakade, Presiding Member

[1] Complainants have filed this consumer complaint against opponent

for getting physical & legal possession of flat along with other reliefs.

[2] Brief facts of the case are as under:-

Complainants booked flat no.803 on 8th floor area admeasuring

349.43 sq.fts. in the project named and styled as “Newa Heights” on plot

bearing no.98, at Sector 8A of village Airoli, Navi Mumbai with opponent

for

total

consideration

of

Rs.20,47,500/-.+

Development

charges

Rs.65,650/- + Advance Maintenance charges Rs.15,600/- + VAT

Rs.15,475/- + Service tax Rs.37,003/-. At the time of booking, opponent

agreed to hand over the flat to complainant by end of December 2011.

Complainants paid an amount of Rs.20,47,500/- + Development charges

Rs.65,650/- + Advance Maintenance charges Rs.15,600/- + VAT

CC/17/872 2

Rs.15,475/- + Service tax Rs.37,003/- which comes to Rs.21,81,228/- to

opponent on different dates. The complainants have also paid Rs.7,800/-

towards

society

formation

charges,

water

&

electricity

charges.

Although complainants paid this much amount of sale consideration in

respect of flat to opponents, opponents failed to complete construction

work, execute agreement and to hand over possession of the flat to

complainants. Communications and notices through advocates were

exchanged between the parties which resulted into fruitless. Hence,

complainants have filed this consumer complaint against opponent for

getting possession of flat no.803 from opponents after executing

agreement in respect of that flat in their favour along with costs and

compensation.

[3] Along with complaint, complainants have filed on record copies of

brochure, cost sheet, payment receipts, bank statement, advocate’s notice

and communication between the parties etc.

[4] After admission of the consumer complaint, notice of consumer

complaint was issued to opponent by publishing the same in newspaper.

However, no one appeared for opponent to contest the consumer

complaint. In view of the same by passing order on 12/10/2017, this

Commission directed to proceed the consumer complaint ex-parte against

opponents. Thereafter, complainants filed their evidence on record along

with documents in their favour.

[5] On perusal of documents filed on record, it has become clear that

complainant booked flat no.803 on 8th floor area admeasuring 349.43

sq.fts. in the project named and styled as “Newa Heights” on plot bearing

no.98, at Sector 8A of village Airoli, Navi Mumbai with opponent for total

consideration of Rs.20,47,500/- + Development charges Rs.65,650/- +

Advance Maintenance charges Rs.15,600/- + VAT Rs.15,475/- + Service

tax Rs.37,003/- which comes to Rs.21,81,228/-. At the time of booking

of flat, opponent agreed to hand over the flat to complainant by end of

December 2011. From documents filed on record, it has become clear

that complainant paid amount of Rs.21,81,228/- to opponent in respect

of these flat no.803 on different dates. Copies of receipts in respect of

payment a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top