STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
Consumer Complaint No.CC/18/513
Mr.Ritesh Kumar
C-908, Cosmos Executive Apartment
Palam Vihar, Gurugram 122 017 ….. Complainant
Versus
Atlanta Ltd. (Through Managing Director)
Project-ATLANTA ENCLAVE
101, Shree Amba Shanti Chambers
Andheri Kurla Road, Opp.Hotel Leela
Andheri (East),
Mumbai 400059 …….Opponent
BEFORE: Justice A.P.Bhangale, President
Dr.S.K.Kakade, Member
PRESENT: Mr.Ritesh Kumar complainant in person
Mr.S.B.Prabhavalkar-Advocate for opponent
ORDER
Per Hon’ble Shri Justice A.P.Bhangale, President
1. Heard Mr.Ritesh Kumar-complainant in person as also learned Advocate
Mr.S.B.Prabhavalkar for the opponents.
2. Initially when this complaint was moved on the ground of urgency by the
complainant in person, we had agreed for final hearing by virtual Video
Conferencing but learned Advocate Mr.S.B.Prabhavalkar for the opponent
objected for final hearing by Video Conferencing on the ground that the
Consumer Courts’ Advocates’ Association (CCAA) have raised objection about
non-existence of rules for virtual h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.