SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

Consumer Complaint No.CC/18/513

Mr.Ritesh Kumar

C-908, Cosmos Executive Apartment

Palam Vihar, Gurugram 122 017 ….. Complainant

Versus

Atlanta Ltd. (Through Managing Director)

Project-ATLANTA ENCLAVE

101, Shree Amba Shanti Chambers

Andheri Kurla Road, Opp.Hotel Leela

Andheri (East),

Mumbai 400059 …….Opponent

BEFORE: Justice A.P.Bhangale, President

Dr.S.K.Kakade, Member

PRESENT: Mr.Ritesh Kumar complainant in person

Mr.S.B.Prabhavalkar-Advocate for opponent

ORDER

Per Hon’ble Shri Justice A.P.Bhangale, President

1. Heard Mr.Ritesh Kumar-complainant in person as also learned Advocate

Mr.S.B.Prabhavalkar for the opponents.

2. Initially when this complaint was moved on the ground of urgency by the

complainant in person, we had agreed for final hearing by virtual Video

Conferencing but learned Advocate Mr.S.B.Prabhavalkar for the opponent

objected for final hearing by Video Conferencing on the ground that the

Consumer Courts’ Advocates’ Association (CCAA) have raised objection about

non-existence of rules for virtual h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top