BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD

C.C.NO.22 OF 2009

Between:

1. Mr.Buddhadeb Bakshmi S/o Kashinath Bakshi
   aged 43 yrs, R/o Unit NO.202, SSV Residency
2. Mr.M.Pradyumna Chary S/o late M.Ranga Chari
   aged 59 years, R/o Unit NO.201, SSV Residency
3. Mr.Anem Umashankar Baba S/o A.Chandra Rao
   aged 34 years, (rep. by his GPA holder Smt AL Paravathi)
   Unit No.101, SSV Residency
4. Mr.P.Ravi Kumar S/o P.Appa Rao
   aged 30 years, R/o Unit No.002, SSV Residence
5. Mr.Anem Sairam S/o A.Chandra Rao
   aged 35 years, R/o Unit No.001, SSV Residence
6. All are R/o at 1-8-506/20, Plot NO.20, Prakash Nagar,
   Begumpet, Hyderabad                                 Complainants

                A N D

1. Ms Tabassum Saleem,
2. Mr.Shaik Saleem

Both are R/o H.No.10-2-194, SS Villa
West Marredpally, Secunderabad

3. M/s SSV Constructions, Partnership Firm

4. Mr.G.Nageswar Rao S/o S.Shankerji
        Managing Partner M/s SSV Constructions

 5. Mr.G.Mahender S/o G.Shankerji
     aged 38 yrs Managing Partner

M/s SSV Constructions

     (OPS 3 to 4 R/o M/s SSV Constructions
      No.30-7, Old Safiluda, Malkajgiri Municipality
      R.R.District

   6. Smt T.Sujatha
       Unit No.102, SSV Residency
      (6^th respondent is a beneficial respondent
      par with the complainants no relief is claimed
      against her)                                                      Opposite parties

Counsel for the Complainant          M/s G.Ramgopal

Counsel for the opposite parties     M/s P.Shiv Kumar (Ops 1 & 2)
Served (OP3to5)
    

          QUORUM:   SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

                                                AND

SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER

MONDAY THE NINETH DAY OF JULY

                                TWO THOUSAND TWELVE

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member

                                        ***

1.             The complainants filed the complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, complaining deficiency in service against the opposite parties no.1 to 5 seeking compensation under various heads, a sum of `48,00,000/- towards expenses for removal of illegal constructions  on the 3<sup>rd</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> Floors of SSV Residency, to keep the elevator in working condition, `1,00,000/- for providing flooring with tiles in the Cellar, an amount of `40,000/- for colouring to the super-structure and compound wall,

2.             Further, the complainants sought for, a sum of  `3,00,000/- to provide  Electricity Generator to SSV Residency, `10,000/- to provide  provision to lift the rain water from the Cellar by fixin