SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
CONSUMER CASE NO. 2567 OF 2018
 
1. MUZAMIL MATTOO & ANR.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus 
1. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED
...........Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL,PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. BINOY KUMAR,MEMBER

For the Complainant :
For the Complainant : Ms. Harshika Verma, Advocate
For the Opp.Party :
For the Opposite Party
: Mr. Rajeev Agarwal, Advocate

Dated : 14 Feb 2022
ORDER
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 12(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by Muzamil Mattoo and Mrs. Neha Godara (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against Opposite Party, M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited (hereinafter referred to as the OP Developer), seeking possession of the Unit alongwith compensation for delay in delivery or in alternative refund of the amount paid towards purchase of Unit alongwith interest and costs as the Opposite Party Developer failed to deliver the Possession of the Unit within stipulated period, which was booked by them in the Project launched by the Developer in the name and style of “Emerald Floors” locat
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top