SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1 CC.No.31/2021

Date of Filing :19.04.2021

Date of Disposal :18.01.2022

BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

DATED THIS THE 18th DAY OF JANUARY 2022

PRESENT

HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH : PRESIDENT

Mr. K.B.SANGANNANAVAR : JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mrs.M.DIVYASHREE : LADY MEMBER

CC.No.31/2021

1. Mridula Manu

W/o Sanjith Kuttan

Aged about 38 years

2. Sanjith Kuttan

S/o M.Kuttan,

Aged about 38 years

Both R/at A-702,

Epitome Crowne,

Bilekahalli, Ranka Colony,

Bannerghatta Road,

BTM Layout,

Bengaluru-76. … Complainant

(By Adv.Sri.B.K.Sampathkumar)

-Versus-

1. M/s.LGCL Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Having its office at No.12/1,

Rest House Road,

Bengaluru-01.

Rep by its Director

2 CC.No.31/2021

(By Adv.Sri.P.P.Hegde)

2. Axis Bank Ltd.,

Having its office at

Retail Assets Center,

No.19, 60 ft road,

Sahakaranagar,

Bengaluru-92.

Rep. by Branch Manager ..Opposite Parties

(By Adv.Sri.Jai.M.Patil)

O R D E R

HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH : PRESIDENT

1.

This complaint is filed U/s.47 of CPA 2019 by the Complainant

No.1

&

2/husband

&

wife

(Complainants)

against

OP.1/developer & OP.2/bank (Ops) and sought for directions

as:

1. Direct the OP.1 to refund Rs.46,32,902/- paid by

the Complainants along with interest at 2% above

MCLR of SBI commencing from 30.10.2017 till the

date of receipt of the amount by the Complainants.

2. Direct the OP.1 to refund Rs.40,61,639/- paid by

the Complainants to OP.2 towards bank loan pre-EMIs

and EMIs and other charges in respect of loan a/c

no.PHR056102916548 along with interest at 2% above

MCLR of SBI commencing from 25.01.2018 till the

date of receipt of the amount by the Complainants.

3. Direct OP.1 to repay the balance outstanding loan

amount availed from OP.2 by the Complainants as per

3 CC.No.31/2021

actual in respect of said loan a/c including the

principal and interest components, directly to the said

bank.

4. Direct OP.1 to refund to the Complainants along

with interest at 2% above MCLR of SBI, any further

sums paid by the Complainants to OP.2 towards the

said bank loan account from this date onwards.

5. Direct OP.2 not to make any demand or request to

the Complainants towards payment of the EMIs from

the date of this complaint in respect of the said loan

account and to collect the remaining instalments

directly from the OP.1 without any adverse effects on

the credit ratings of the Complainants

6. Direct OP.1 to pay Rs.5 lakhs each of the

Complainants towards mental agony and suffering.

7. Direct OP.1 to pay Rs.1 crore to the Complainants

towards opportunity loss.

8. Direct OP.1 to pay the cost of this complaint.

2.

The brief facts of the case of the Complainants/husband and

wife are that, upon promises and assurances of OP.1/developer,

they booked the Row House bearing No.12, super built up area

2652 sq.ft with exclusive right to use 750 sq.ft of terrace area

and 446.71 sq.ft of garden area along with 2718.13 sq.ft of

undivided share in the land on which the project namely Row

House Residential real estate project known as „LGCL Pueblo‟

was built consisting of 59 houses with amenities such as

4 CC.No.31/2021

swimming pool, parks and open spaces, club house etc., by

entering in to sale and construction agreement dtd.18.11.2017

for a total sale consideration of Rs.2,06,71,402/-. As per the

agreements the possession of the house was on 30.06.2019.

Since the OP.2/bank i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top