SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2nd Additional Bench

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH

Consumer Complaint No. 876 of 2017

Date of Institution : 06.10.2017

Date of Reserve : 14.05.2018

Date of Decision : 01.06.2018

Amanbir Singh Sarna S/o Sh. Jatinderbir Singh, resident of house

No. 241, New Model Town, Ludhiana

….Complainant

Versus

1. State of Punjab through Secretary, Department of Housing

and Urban Development, Sector 9, Chandigarh.

2. Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan,

Sector 62, SAS Nagar through its Chief Administrator.

….Opposite Parties

Consumer Complaint under Section 17 of

the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Quorum:-

Shri Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member.

Shri Rajinder Kumar Goyal, Member

Present:-

For the complainant

: Sh. A.S. Salar, Advocate

For opposite party No.1: Sh. B.B. Menon, AAG, Punjab

For opposite party no.2 : Sh. Anuj Kohli, Advocate

Consumer Complaint No. 876 of 2017

2

GURCHARAN SINGH SARAN, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER

ORDER

The complainant has filed this complaint under Section

17 of the CP Act on the averments that the Ops launched their

project

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top