SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Daily Order

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH

Complaint case No.

:

938 of 2016

Date of Institution

:

20.12.2016

Date of Decision

:

07.03.2017

Sh.Gurpinder Singh son of Sh.Balwant Singh, resident of House No.108, New Officers Colony, Patiala.

……Complainant

V e r s u s

  1. M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited, 115, Ansal Bhawan, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001, through its Managing Director.
  2. Regional Manager, M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited, SCO 183-184, Sector 9-C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh.

              .... Opposite Parties

Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

BEFORE:         JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT.

                        MR. DEV RAJ, MEMBER.

                        MRS. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER.

Argued by:        Sh.Pankaj Khullar, Advocate proxy for Sh.R.C. Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

                         None for the opposite parties (Defence struck of).

PER JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT

                The complainant moved an application dated 05.02.2012, to the opposite parties, for purchase of a residential unit, in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top