SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Panaji-Goa
 
Execution Application No. EA/13/2003
In
 
1. Vijaylakshmi V. Naik
Tiswadi, Goa
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Aashiana Builders
Panaji, Goa
...........Respondent(s)
Execution Application No. EA 13/2013
In
 
1. Smt. Vijaylakshmi V. Naik
H. No. 128, Ribandar Tiswadi, Goa.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Aashiana Builders,
Durga Chambers, 18th June Road, Panajim Goa.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE N.A.Britto PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Smt.Vidhya R. Gurav MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DH is represented by Adv. Ms. N. Mayenkar. JD is present in person. Both states that sale deeds have already been executed in both the cases and there is nothing more required to be done in these excution proceedings. They have also filed consent terms. Accordingly, the proceedings stands closed.

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE N.A.Britto]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Smt.Vidhya R. Gurav]
MEMBER
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top