SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

Execution Application No.EA/18/75 IN CC/2016/16

MR.SADANAND ARJUN MANE,

R/at 16/250, Pratik CHS Ltd.,

Kannamwar Nagar No.1,

Vikhroli (East), Mumbai 400 083

...........Executant(s)/

Complainant(s)

Versus

MR.SHAIKH HAROON RASHID,

Proprietor, M/s.High Tech India Builders &

Developers,

Having office situated at:

165, Surti Building, 2nd Floor,

Pipe Road, Kurla (West),

Mumbai 400 070.

………Accused/

Opponent(s)

BEFORE:

Mr. Justice A.P. Bhangale – President

Dr.S.K. Kakade – Member

For the

Executant(s)

Complainant(s):

In person.

For the

Accused(s)/

Opponent(s):

Accused Shaikh Haroon Rashid along with Advocate

Mr.Amit Tungare.

ORDER

Per Hon’ble Mr.Justice A.P. Bhangale – President:

This is Virtual/Video Conferencing hearing. Execution applicant

is present in person. Accused/opponent Mr.Shaikh Haroon Rashid is

present along with Advocate Mr.Amit Tungare.

Execution applicant admits having signed consent terms and

conditions which are signed by respondent Mr.Shaikh Haroon Rashid.

Accordingly the cheque bearing No.000228 dated 10/10/2020 drawn on

Kot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top