SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
EXECUTION REVISION PETITION NO. 4 OF 2016
 
(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)
1. M/S. MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. K. ALFRED
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. ANUP K THAKUR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate
Mr. Nishant Gautam, Advocate
For the Respondent :
In person

Dated : 22 Jul 2016
ORDER

JUDGMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER

1.      The complainant/respondent obtained finance to the extent of Rs. 1,00,000/- from the petitioner company for purchase of a vehicle and a loan agreement dated 25.09.2006 was executed between the parties. The wife of the complainant stood as guarantor for the loan taken by him. The vehicle was allegedly surrendered by the wife of the complainant on account of the inability of the complainant to pay the dues of the petitioner company. The respondent thereupon lodged a complaint alleging forcible repossession of his vehicle. The vehicle was returned to the complainant, on the orders of the lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top