BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AT HYDERABAD.
F.A. 1113/2008 against C.C. 155/2007, Dist. Forum, Kurnool.
Between:
M. Narayana
s/o. M. Krishna Murthy
R/o. 4-89, Allur Road
Nandikotkur. *** Appellant/
Complainant.
And
1) The Divisional Manager
New India Assurance Company Ltd.
HDCP Complex
R.S. Road, Kurnool.
2) The General Secretary
Kurnool Dist. Motor Workers Union (CITU)
Behind Durga Lodge
N.H-7, Kurnool. *** Respondents/
Opposite Parties
Counsel for the Appellant: M/s. B. Anjayneyulu
Counsel for the Resp: M/s. KNV Radhra Krishna (R1)
CORAM:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO, PRESIDENT
SRI SYED ABDULLAH, MEMBER
&
SRI R. L. NARASIMHA RAO, MEMBER
TUESDAY, THIS THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)
***
1) Appellant is unsuccessful complainant.
2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he had taken Group Janata Personal Accident Policy (JPA) from R1 insurance company through its agent Kurnool District Motor Workers Union R2 for a sum of Rs. 1 lakh covering the period from 16.4.2001 to 15.4.2006. His name was mentioned at S.No. 34 in the policy. While so on 16.3.2003 while he was driving the lorry at Machavaram village accident took place resulting in grievous injuries on his person. The said fact was intimated to the police which in turn registered as a case in Crime No. 30/2003 u/s 337 IPC. R2 informed the said fact to R1. He was shifted to Govt. Hospital, Mahaboobnagar and there after to Govt. Hospital, Kurnool where his right leg up to knee was amputated resulting permanent disability. He also suffered fracture to his right leg and hand. He took treatment in the Govt. Hospital for four months as an in-patient and was discharged on 4.7.2003. Repeatedly he joined in the hospital for several times. Whenever he was going to R1 it was promising to settle the claim but did not do so. For the first time on 9.6.2006 it issued a letter to him to submit the reasons for delay along with hospital records. On that he sent all the records by registered post. He filed a petition before the Dist. Legal Services Authority however R1 did not respond. Therefore he filed the complaint claiming Rs. 1 lakh covered under the policy with interest @ 12% p.a., together with compensation of Rs. 20,000/- for mental agony and costs.
3) The insurance company R1 resisted the case. While admitting issuance of policy it denied that the complainant had sustained injuries in the accident that took place on 6.3.2003. As per the disability certificate the complainant had suffered only 50% disability and therefore he was