SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2043 OF 2018
 
(Against the Order dated 16/08/2018 in Complaint No. 644/2015 of the State Commission Maharashtra)
1. RAJEEV HERPRESAD JAISWAL
R/O. FLAT NO 201, PANCHSHEEL-IV, RAHEJA TOWNSHIP MALAD (WEST)
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA 400 097
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. BHARATI PURSNANI & 8 ORS.
R/O. 13/GOLDEN PEAK BUILDING 4 FLOOR, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD KHAR (WEST)
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA 400 052
2. MR. RAJESH K. PURSNANI
R/O. 13/GOLDEN PEAK BUILDING 4 FLOOR, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD KHAR (WEST)
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA 400 052
3. M/S. SUBHAM BUILDERS & DEVELOPRS
THROUGH ITS PARTNERS, AT D-1, 4 FLOOR RENUKA CHAMBERS OPP CROSSWORD, J.M. ROAD, SHIVAJI NAGAR
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA 411 004
4. MR. BHARAT BABULAL JAIN
R/AT FLAT NO A-1902, GUNDECHA GARDEN LALBAUG
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA 400 012
5. MR. ANANT DILIP PANDIT
PARTNER OF M/S. SHUBHAM BUILDERS & DEVELOPRES APEX MULTICONS PVT LTD, OFFICE NO 201 TO 204, 2 FLOOR CITY SQUARE BUILDING NEAR ZENITH SHIVAJI NAGAR
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA 411005
6. MR. PRAKASH C. RAKHYANI
R/O. FLA TNO 502, A-WING, 5 FLOOR WAGHERE PARK NEAR KIRTI HOSPITAL PIMPRI
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA 411 017
7. MR. RAHUL BHAGWANRAO KADAM
R/O. A-3/201, KARISHMA, NEAR SANGAM PRESS KOTHURD
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA 411 029
8. MR. RAMESH SHANKARRAO SHRIMANWAR
R/O. C/903, 10, KASTUR KUNJ ICS COLONY BHOSALE NAGAR
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA 411 005
9. MR. LAXMAN MOTIRAM MUDKHELE
R/O. 77, VIVEK NAGAR
NANDED 431605
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Advocate
Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mr. Uday Warunjikar, Advocate for R-1

Dated : 11 Sep 2019
ORDER

JUSTICE V.K.JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER (ORAL)

          The complainant/respondent no.1 & 2 alongwith Late Ms. Mohini K. Pursnani, entered into an agreement with respondent no.3 M/s Shubham Builders & Developers, where-under a bungalow in a project namely ‘Serene County’ which respondent no.3 was to construct, was to be constructed and sold to them for a consideration of Rs.48,96,000/-.  An agreement between the above referred persons was executed in this regard on 13.03.2009.  Since the bungalow was not constructed in terms of the said agreement, the appellant and respondent no.4 came into picture and executed an MOU on 29.06.2013, whereby they undertook to execute the work and complete the construction at their cost, in accordance with the sanctioned plan, within six months from the date of commencement certificate to be obtained and/or from the date of construction.  The MOU was executed between the complainants and Ms. Mohini K. Pursnani acting through their Attorney Sh. Ashok Chotrani as the first party and the appellant and Mr. Bharat Babulal Jain as the second party.  Ms. Mohini Pursnani had died before the said MOU came to be executed.  Therefore, the Power of Attorney in favour of Mr. Ashok Chotrani was valid only to the extent he was authorized to act on behalf of the complainants.  Clause 6, 9 & 12 of the MOU to the extent they are relevant, read as under:

6.      The PARTY OF THE SECOND PART hereby agree and undertake to execute, carry out and complete the construction work of the existing respective Row Hoses/Twin Bungalows is to be provided to them at the entire cost of The PARTY OF THE SECOND PART in accordance with the plan as may be approved and sanctioned by concerned Authorities within 6 (six) months from the date of commencement certificate to be obtained and/or from the date of Construction. 

          It is agreed by the Developers that the project should be completed within 6 months from the date of commencement certificate to be obtained and/or from the date of Construction and acquiring all the rights, title and interest of said partnership firm i.e. M/s Shubham Builders and Developers.

9.      The PARTY OF THE SECOND PART is hereby expressly agreed, declared and confirmed that the PARTY OF THE SECOND PART is entitled to enter into agreement

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top