SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2059 OF 2019
 
(Against the Order dated 12/07/2019 in Complaint No. 66/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
1. M/S. JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. DN KHURANA
2. .
.
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. C. VISWANATH,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA,MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Senior Advocate
: Mr. Sumeet Sharma, Advocate
: Mr. Tenzen Negi, Advocate
: Mr. Paras Chaudhary, Advocate
: Mr. Kaushik Advocate
: Ms. Pallavi, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For Respondents-1 to 3 : Mr. Sankalp Mehrotra, Advocate
For Respondent-4 : Mr. Mayank Singh, Advocate
For Intervener : Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate

Dated : 26 Sep 2022
ORDER

1.      Heard Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Sumeet Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant and Mr. Sankalp Mehrotra, Advocate, for respondents-1 to 3, Mr. Mayank Singh, Advocate, for respondent-4. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate argued as an intervener, on legal issue.

2.      Jaiprakash Associates Limited (opposite parties-1 & 2) has filed above appeal from the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, dated 12.07.2019, passed in CC/66/2017, partly allowing the complaint with cost of Rs.10000/- and directing the appellant to return Rs.4578008/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of actual payment, to the complainants.

3.      The office has reported 4 days delay in filing the appeal. The appellant has filed IA/16782/2019, for condonation of delay. Cause shown is sufficient. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

4.      D.N. Khurana, Mrs. Prem Khurana and Konark Khurana (respondents-1 to 3) filed CC/66/2017 for directing Jaiprakash Associate Limited and Jaypee Infratech Limited (opposite parties-1 to 2) (i) to refund Rs.4578008/- with interest @24% per annum, from the date of respective deposits till the date of refund,, (ii) to pay Rs.5/- lacs as compensation for medical treatment, Rs.21000/-, per month from 27.08.2013 till the date of refund and Rs.15/- lacs as compensation for mental agony and harassment, (iii) to pay Rs.25000/- as the cost of litigation; and (iv) any other relief, which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case.

5.      The complainants stated that Jaiprakash Associates Limited (the appellant) and Jaypee Infratech Limited (respondent-4) (hereinafter referred to as the builders) were companies, registered under Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of developing and constructing group housing project. They launched a group housing project in the name of “Kasa Isles” at Jaypee Greens, Noida and made wide publicity in the year 2010. Mr. Kuldeep Verma and Ms. Simmi Verma applied for a flat and deposited the required money on 30.07.2010. The builders provisionally allotted Unit No.-KSI 11-1603 (super area 1570 sq.ft., total consideration of Rs.4702280/-, on 27.08.2010 to them. Under the allotment letter dated 27.08.2010, the builders assured to deliver possession within 36 months from the date of allotment with grace period of six months. Mr. Kuldeep Verma and Ms. Simmi Verma transferred the aforesaid unit to the complainants with prior approval of the builders. The complainants paid Rs.4569276/- and Rs.121154/- towards interest upto 25.05.2013. The builders provisionally allotted Unit No.-KSI 11-1603 (super area 1570 sq.ft.), to the complainants on 25.05.2013, in which payment of Rs.4569276/- has been acknowledged. The period of 36 months expired on 27.08.2013 and grace period of 180 days as given under Clause-7.2 of Standard Terms and Condition also expired on 27.02.2014. The compl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top