SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 380 OF 2019
 
(Against the Order dated 24/10/2018 in Complaint No. 347/2016 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
1. JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REP. JAYPEE GREENS, SECTOR 128,
NOIDA 201301
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. DEEPTI KUMAR & 2 ORS.
GYANSURAJ 101, KANTH ROAD, RAM GANGA VIHAR
MORADABAD
2. AXIS BANK LTD
THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, TRISHUL, 3 FLOOR, LAW GARDEN
AHMEDABAD
GUJARAT
3. JAYPEE INFRATECH LTD
THROUGH RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL JAYPEE GREENS SECTOR 128
NOIDA 201301
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. C. VISWANATH,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA,MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Senior Advocate
: Mr. Sumeet Sharma, Advocate
: Mr. Tenzen Negi, Advocate
: Mr. Paras Chaudhary, Advocate
: Mr. Kaushik Advocate
: Ms. Pallavi, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For Respondent-1 : Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate
For Respondent-2 : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate
For Respondent-3 : Mr. Mayank Singh, Advocate
For Intervener : Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate

Dated : 26 Sep 2022
ORDER

1.      Heard Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Sumeet Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant and Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent-1, Mr. Devendra Kumar Singh, Advocate, for respondent-2, Mr. Mayank Singh, Advocate, for respondent-3. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate, as an intervener, on legal issue.

2.      Jaiprakash Associates Limited (opposite party-2) has filed above appeal from the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, dated 24.10.2018, passed in CC/347/2016, partly allowing the complaint with cost of Rs.10000/- and compensation of Rs.20000/- and directing the appellant to return Rs.4778280/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of actual payment, firstly to Axis Bank Limited (opposite party-3), who had advanced loan to the complainant and secondly the balance amount to the complainant.

3.      The office has reported 89 days delay in filing the appeal. The appellant has filed IA/3673/2019, for condonation of delay. Cause shown is sufficient. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

4.      Deepti Kumar (respondent-1) filed CC/347/2016 for directing Jaypee Infratech Limited and Jaiprakash Associates Limited (opposite parties-1 and 2) (i) to refund Rs.4776280/- with interest @24% per annum, from the date of respective deposits till the date of refund, (ii) to pay Rs.39586/-, per month from 16.11.2015 till the date of refund, (iii) to pay Rs.20000/- per month towards rent from 16.11.2015 till the date of refund, (iv) to pay just compensation and punitive damages, (v) to direct opposite party-3 to pay Rs.5/- lacs, for committing unfair trade practice, (vi) to pay Rs.10000/-, as the cost of litigation; and (vii) any other relief, which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case.

5.      The complainant stated that Jaypee Infratech Limited (respondent-2) and Jaiprakash Associates Limited (the appellant) (hereinafter referred to as the builders) were companies, registered under Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of developing and constructing group housing project. They launched a group housing project in the name of “Garden Isles” at Jaypee Greens, Sector-131 &133, Noida and made wide publicity in the year 2011. Allured with lucrative advertisements and believing on it, the complainant applied for a flat and deposited the required money of Rs.2.5/- lacs on 06.02.2012. The builders provisionally allotted Unit No.-GDI 25-2103 (super area 1205 sq.ft., Basic Sale Price of Rs.4359690/- Total Consideration of Rs.4898890/-, including Rs.2.5/- lacs for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top