PANKAJBEN DILIPBHAI PATEL vs HIRAL AGENCY & 4 ORS.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

judgment-img


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI


FIRST APPEAL NO. 454 OF 2012

(Against the Order dated 30/04/2012 in Complaint No. 172/2002 of the State Commission Gujarat)

1. PANKAJBEN DILIPBHAI PATEL
77, Vallabh Vidyanagar Society, Mu. Bawla
Dist. Ahmedabad

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. HIRAL AGENCY & 4 ORS.
Notice to be served to Rajnibhai Keshavlal Parikh, Shroff Bazar, Bala,
Dist. Ahmedabad
2. MEENABEN RAJNIKANT PARIKH
Bhatt Fari, Near Ramji Mandir, Bawla
Distt- Ahmedabad
3. DINESHKUMARPARSOTTAMDAS PARIKH
34, Kerala, Tal. Bawla,
Distt- Ahmedabad
4. RAMESHKUMAR PARSOTTAMDAS APRIKH
34, Kerala, Tal. Bawla,
Dist. Ahmedabad
Gujarat
5. BHUPENDRA KESHAVLAL PARIKH,
Bhatt Fari, Near Ramji Mandir, Bawla
Dist. Ahmedabad

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
	HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER
	HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Appellant :

MR. V. M. PANCHOLI

For the Respondent :

Mr. Mayur Shah, Advocate

Dated : 11 Jul 2013

ORDER

Different members of the same family made cash deposited with M/s Hiral Agency Firm through their partners. Complaint No.171/2012 was

-4-

filed by Hardik Dilipbhai Patel against Hiral Agency alleging that he depos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge

Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :