SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
APPEAL NO. 524 OF 2007
 
(Against the Order dated 27/07/2007 in Complaint No. 76/1999 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)
1. GODREJ PHOTO ME LTD.
MANAGING DIRECTOR , WESTERN REGIONAL & HEAD OFFICE,
II ND FLOOR, GODREJ SOAPS, H.O. BUILDING, GODREJ
MUMBAI - 400 079
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. SMT. SUSHMA MADAN & ANR.
W/O SHRI VIJAY MADAN, ASHIRWAD COLOUR LAB,
14, FIRST FLOOR, HARE KRISHNA COMPLEX, 10 NO.BUS
BHOPAL
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocate
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 31 Oct 2012
ORDER

State Commission allowed the complaint, inter alia, relying upon its own decisions in C.C. No.23/1996 (Prachi Colour Lab vs. Godrej & Kis Ltd.) decided on 11.9.2002 and C.C. No.17/1999 (Sanjeev Borana vs. Godrej & Kis Ltd.) decided on 5.4.2004.  Facts in those cases were similar to the present case.  Product in question in the present case and in those cases and the manufacturing defects pointed out were also same/similar.  Appellant was the opp.party in those cases as well. 

Against the de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top