SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/11/63
 
1. MOHAMMED MUZAFFAR
M/S CROWN ENGG WORKS PLOT NO 16, SURVAY NO 53 & 55 MAILARDEVPALLU BANDLAGUDDA I E RAJENDER NAGAR R R DIST
ANDHRA PARADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S COTMAC PVT LTD
SURVEY NO 169/2 ABOVE CENTRAL BANK MUMBAI RUNE ROAD AKRUDI PUNE
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale Member
 
PRESENT:MD MUNEERUDDIN , Advocate for the Appellant 1
 
Mrs.K. Nagarkatti, Advocate for the respondent.
......for the Respondent
ORDER

Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

          There is a delay of 519 days in filing appeal.  Reasons mentioned in the application though may not just and satisfactory still the fact is that opponent from this application/appeal has also filed an appeal challenging the impugned order bearing appeal No.1078/2009 and which is admitted for final hearing.  Under the circumstances, we find it proper and just to condone the delay in filing this appeal also.  Other side has no objection for the same and accordingly, application for cond



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top