SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/11/63
 
1. MOHAMMED MUZAFFAR
M/S CROWN ENGG WORKS PLOT NO 16, SURVAY NO 53 & 55 MAILARDEVPALLU BANDLAGUDDA I E RAJENDER NAGAR R R DIST
ANDHRA PARADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S COTMAC PVT LTD
SURVEY NO 169/2 ABOVE CENTRAL BANK MUMBAI RUNE ROAD AKRUDI PUNE
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale Member
 
PRESENT:MD MUNEERUDDIN , Advocate for the Appellant 1
 
Mrs.K. Nagarkatti, Advocate for the respondent.
......for the Respondent
ORDER

Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

          There is a delay of 519 days in filing appeal.  Reasons mentioned in the application though may not just and satisfactory still the fact is that opponent from this application/appeal has also filed an appeal challenging the impugned order bearing appeal No.1078/2009 and which is admitted for final hearing.  Under the circumstances, we find it proper and just to condone the delay in filing this appeal also.  Other side has no objection for the same and accordingly, application for condonation of delay is allowed.  No order as to costs as far as delay condonation application is concerned.

Pronounced

Dated 6th April 2011.

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale]
Member
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top