NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. C. VISWANATH, CJ, MR. RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, J
JMD GARDENS RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
M/s JMD LIMITED – Respondent
ORDER
“8. Relief Sought
In the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Complainant respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Commission may be pleased to grant the following reliefs paragraphs.
8.1 With respect to seepage direct the Opposite Party No. 1 to identify the cause of seepage and immediately take steps to rectify this structural defect within two months or in alternative the Opposite Party No. 1 should pay the Complainant Association an amount of Rupees Nine Crores and Fifteen Lakhs for it to take steps to rectify this defect. The Architect in his report has given estimation that this much amount will be required to rectify this defect. A copy of the Architect's report is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure-Q.
8.2 Direct the Opposite Party No l and 2 to pay every Resident the following amounts:
(i) Refund of the contingency deposit fund and extra EDC illegally collected from the Residents, with an interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of payment of the contingency deposit fund and EDC by the Residents. The Residents have also claimed compensation towards harassment and refund of higher charges paid towards maintenance and DG sets. The amount due to each Re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.