ISHAN GUPTA vs M/S. IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. - 2022 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 1260

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 1260

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, PRESIDING MEMBER, DR. INDER JIT SINGH, MEMBER
ISHAN GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
M/S. IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Complainant: Mr. Shaurya Punj, Mr. Amit Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Sameer Chaudhary, Mr. Rahul Ahuja, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Ms. Surabhi Pandey, Ms. Ruchi Kumar, Ms. Archana Yadav, Mr. Sunil Mund

Table of Content
1. claim for refund due to non-delivery of property. (Para 2 , 3 , 5)
2. arguments raised regarding the maintainability of the complaint. (Para 4)
3. court ruling on possession due date and refund obligations. (Para 6)

ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Shaurya Punj, Advocate, for the complainant, Mr. Sameer Chaudhary, Advocate, for opposite parties-1 and 2 and Mr. Sunil Mund, Advocate, for opposite party-3.

2. Ishan Gupta (the complainant) has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.13483220/- to the complainant with interest @18% per annum from 14.10.2017 till the date of payment, (ii) pay Rs.50/- lakhs, as compensation for mental agony and harassment (iii) pay cost of the litigation; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts of the case.

3. The complainant stated that opposite parties-1 to 4 were companies, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of development and construction of group housing projects and selling its unit to the prospective buyers. Opposite parties-2 to 4 were owners of large area of land at Sector-67-A, Gurgaon, Haryana and obtained Licence No.05 of 2013 dated 21.02.2013, f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document