Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, PRESIDING MEMBER, DR. INDER JIT SINGH, MEMBER
MONA MAYOR & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
PIONEER URBAN LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in possession and additional unapproved charges lead to claims. (Para 1 , 3 , 9) |
| 2. court's rejection of op's claims of force majeure and review of unfair clauses. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 14) |
| 3. op's arguments on charges and club access inadequately supported. (Para 10 , 15) |
| 4. awarding costs for litigation due to service deficiencies. (Para 16) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed by the Complainants against the opposite party as detailed above, inter aila praying for directions to the OP:-
2. Notice was issued to OP on 05.06.2018, giving them 30 days’ time to file written statement. Written statement was filed by OP on 18.07.2018.
3. It is averred in the Complaint that: -
4. The OP in their written statement/reply stated that:-
5. Complainants in their rejoinder denied the allegations of OP and also cited various Hon’ble Supreme court judgements.
6. Evidence by way of an Affidavit was filed by the complainants and the Opposite Party broadly on the lines of averments made in the complaint Written Synopsis were filed by the Complainants
7. Heard counsels of both sides. The details of the flat allotted to the Complainant/other relevant details of the c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
