Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE V.K. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
HEMANT ANAND – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SUPERTECH LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer booked apartment, paid amount but no possession delivered. (Para 1) |
| 2. opposite party claims construction delays due to external and internal factors. (Para 2) |
| 3. commission's jurisdiction based on value of services and compensation claimed. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. clear deficiency of service due to failure in timely possession delivery. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 5. reasons for the complainant's claim concerning delayed possession. (Para 7) |
| 6. the final order regarding refund and interest payable by supertech ltd. (Para 9) |
| 7. commission directs refund along with interest and costs. (Para 10) |
The complainant booked a residential apartment with the opposite party Supertech Limited, in a project namely “Supertech Hues”, which the opposite party was to develop in Sector 68 of Gurgaon. The booking was made on 14.01.2017 and after allotment of flat number F/0101 in the aforesaid project to the complainant for a consideration of Rs.92,52,038/- a Buyer Development Agreement was executed between the parties on 18.07.2014. As per the aforesaid agreement the possession was to be offered to the complainant within 42 months i.e by July,2017 with a grace
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
